Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;8(4):1533-1538.
doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2370. Epub 2014 Jul 22.

miR-449a and CDK6 in gastric carcinoma

Affiliations

miR-449a and CDK6 in gastric carcinoma

Li-Ping Li et al. Oncol Lett. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

The present study aimed to identify the association between microRNA (miR/miRNA)-449a, the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)6 protein and gastric carcinoma, and discuss the effect of miR-449a on the expression of the CDK6 protein. Quantitative (q)PCR and western blot analysis were used to analyze the expression of the miR-449a and the CDK6 protein in gastric carcinoma and tumor-adjacent normal tissues. The real-time cell analyzer and the DAPI staining test were used to monitor the different miR-449a levels regulating the proliferation and apoptosis of the MGC-803 cell line. Immunofluorescence and western blot analyses were used to detect the expression level of the CDK6 protein in the cells of the miR-449a upregulation and downregulation groups, and a control group. A scratch test was used to study the effects of miR-449a expression on migration and invasion. It was found that the expression of miR-449a was downregulated and the expression of CDK6 protein was upregulated in gastric carcinoma tissue. The level of MGC-803 cell proliferation was decreased and the apoptosis level was increased by the upregulation of miR-449a expression, and the opposite effect was shown by the downregulation of expression. The expression of the CDK6 protein in the MGC-803 cells was downregulated by upregulating the expression of miR-449a. The distance of the scratch was shortened markedly after 12 h by downregulating the expression of miR-449a in the MGC-803 cells. The present study identified that a lower expression level of miR-449 and a higher expression level of CDK6 may contribute to the occurrence and development of gastric cancer. Furthermore, it was shown that miR-449a is able to regulate the expression of the CDK6 protein.

Keywords: MGC-803; cyclin-dependent kinase 6 protein; gastric carcinoma; microRNA-449; real-time cell analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Relative expression of miR-449a in gastric carcinoma and tumor-adjacent normal tissues, as determined by qPCR. ‘a’ represents the tumor-adjacent normal tissue; relative expression, 24.665±1.557. ‘b’ represents the gastric carcinoma tissue; relative expression, 49.207±13.433, P<0.001. (B) The relative expression of the CDK6 protein in the gastric carcinoma and tumor-adjacent normal tissues, as determined by western blot analysis. (C) ‘a’ represent the tumor-adjacent normal tissue; relative expression, 0.482±0.290. ‘b’ represents the gastric carcinoma tissue; relative expression, 0.792±0.165, P=0.003. (D) The relative expression of CDK6 protein was negatively correlated with the relative expression of miR-449a, as determined by Spearman’s correlation analysis, r(tumor-adjacent normal tissue)=-0.614; r(gastric carcinoma tissue)=-0.694, P<0.001. Relative expression is measured as a percentage and *P<0.05 vs. tumor-adjacent normal tissues.. miR, microRNA; qPCR, quantitative PCR; CDK6, cyclin-dependent kinase 6.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Relative expression of the miR-449a. ‘a’ represents the miR-449a upregulation group; relative expression, 81.844±5.095, P<0.001. ‘b’ represents the control group; relative expression, 26.233±2.011. ‘c’ represents the miR-449a downregulation group; relative expression, 6.733±1.575. Relative expression is measured as a percentage and *P<0.05. (B) The experimental result of the scratch test (x100). (C) ‘a’ represents the miR-449a upregulation group; distance change between edges of scratch, 0.503±0.080. ‘b’ represents the control group; distance change between edges of scratch, 0.198±0.068. ‘c’ represents the miR-449a downregulation group; distance change between edges of scratch, 2.519±0.350, P<0.001. The unit is of measurement is μm and *P<0.05. miR, microRNA.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Proliferation of the MGC-803 cells in 3 groups, as observed by RTCA. ‘a’ represents the miR-449a upregulation group; proliferation coefficient, 4.282±0.386, P<0.001. ‘b’ represents the control group; proliferation coefficient, 9.002±0.066. ‘c’ represents the miR-449a downregulation group; proliferation coefficient, 9.049±0.073. (B) The relative expression of the CDK6 protein in 3 groups. (C) ‘a’ represents the miR-449a upregulation group; relative expression of CDK6 protein, 21.243±4.097, P<0.001. ‘b’ represents the control group; relative expression, 41.831±1.647. ‘c’ represents the miR-449a downregulation group; relative expression, 67.418±1.369. Relative expression is measured as a percentage and *P<0.05. RTCA, real-time cell analysis; miR, microRNA; CDK6, cyclin-dependent kinase 6.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Experimental result of the immunofluorescence staining. The CDK6 protein is shown as bright green fluorescence, as observed by fluorescence microscopy using a wavelength of 475nm. (A) MGC-803 cells of the miR-449a upregulation group (magnification, ×400). (B) MGC-803 cells of the miR-449a downregulation group (magnification, ×400). (C and D) Cells of the control group. miR, microRNA; CDK6, cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (magnifications, ×400 for A and ×10 for D).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Experimental results of the DAPI staining. (A) The MGC-803 cells of the miR-449a upregulation group with nuclei stained and showing blue fluorescence (x400 magnification). (B) Cells of the miR-449a downregulation group (x400 magnification). (C) Cells of the control group (x400 magnification). (D) ‘a’ represents the MGC-803 cells of the miR-449a upregulation group; number of the apoptic cells, 68.909±7.698, P=0.002. ‘b’ represents the MGC-803 cells of the miR-449a downregulation group; number of apoptostic cells, 14.000±2.098 in 10 randomly selected fields of view. ‘c’ represents the cells of the control group; number of apoptotic cells, 21.000±3.606. *P<0.001 vs. control group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith MG, Hold GL, Tahara E, et al. Cellular and molecular aspects of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:2979–2990. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. - PubMed
    1. Stenvang J, Petri A, Lindow M, et al. Inhibition of microRNA function by antimiR oligonucleotides. Silence. 2012;3:1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu WK, Lee CW, Cho CH, et al. MicroRNA dysregulation in gastric cancer: a new player enters the game. Oncogene. 2010;29:5761–5771. - PubMed
    1. Lizé M, Klimke A, Dobbelstein M. MicroRNA-449 in cell fate determination. Cell Cycle. 2011;10:2874–2882. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources