Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 10:7:627.
doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-627.

A cross-sectional study on the microbiological quality and safety of raw chicken meats sold in Nairobi, Kenya

Affiliations

A cross-sectional study on the microbiological quality and safety of raw chicken meats sold in Nairobi, Kenya

Joyce Arua Odwar et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: Chicken is a rich source of meat protein and is increasingly being consumed in urban areas in Kenya. However, under poor hygienic environment, raw chicken meat presents an ideal substrate supporting the growth of pathogenic Escherichia coli and Coliform bacteria indicating the potential presence of other pathogenic bacteria; this may constitute a major source of food-borne illnesses in humans. This study sought to assess the microbiological quality and safety of raw chicken meat sold in Nairobi, Kenya by determining the E. coli/coliform contamination levels as well as the antimicrobial resistance patterns and pathogenicity of E. coli isolated.

Findings: We conducted a Cross-sectional study to collect two hundred raw chicken samples that were randomly purchased between the periods of August 2011-February 2012. Enumeration of bacteria was done using 3 M Petri film E. coli/Coliform count plates, isolation and identification of E. coli through standard cultural and biochemical testing, antimicrobial susceptibilities interpreted according to criteria set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2012) while Polymerase chain reaction assays were used to determine presence of virulence genes in isolated E. coli. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 17.0. Contamination rates were 97% and 78% respectively for Coliform bacteria and E. coli. Seventy six percent of samples fell under the unacceptable microbial count limit (>100 cfu/ml) and significant differences in the E. coli/coliform counts (p < 0.001) were observed among the chicken retail outlets with samples from supermarkets having the lowest level of contamination compared to the rest of the retail outlets. Seventy five percent of the isolates were resistant to at least one of the 12 antibiotics tested with resistance to tetracycline being the highest at 60.3%. In addition 40.4% E. coli isolates were positive for the ten virulence genes tested.

Conclusion: Raw retail chicken meats in Nairobi are not only highly contaminated, but also with potentially pathogenic and multi-drug resistant strains of E. coli. It will be important for public health authorities and retail chicken processing outlets to collaborate in ensuring adherence to set out principles of hygienic processing and handling of chicken meats in order to reduce potential risks of infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of E. coli count among the 5 retail outlet classifications. Counts were evenly distributed., the size of the boxes for high- middle income, low-middle income and low income areas indicate that the middle 50% E. coli counts are spread out for these groups while for high class butcheries and supermarkets the box sizes indicate that the middle 50% of the counts are clumped together.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of Coliform count among the 5 retail outlet classifications. Apart from supermarkets, the other 4 retail outlet classifications have bulk of the count concentrated on the high end of the scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lindqvist R, Anderson Y, De Jong B, Norberg P. A summary of reported food borne disease incidents in Sweden, 1992 to 1997. J Food Protect. 2000;63:1315–1320. - PubMed
    1. Su HP, Chu SI, Tsai JL, Lee CL, Pan TM. Bacterial food borne illness outbreaks in Northern Taiwan, 1995 to 2001. J Infect Chem. 2005;11:146–151. doi: 10.1007/s10156-005-0383-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lynch M, Painter J, Woodruff R, Braden C. Surveillance of food borne disease outbreaks in United States, 1998 to 2002. Morbidity Mortality Wkly Rep Surveil Summaries/CDC. 2006;55:1–34. - PubMed
    1. Fratamico PM, Bhunia AK, Smith JL. Microbiology and Molecular biology. Wymondham, Norfolk: Caster academic press; 2005. Food borne pathogens; p. 273.
    1. Pertersen KE, James WO. Agents, vehicles and causal inference in bacterial food borne disease outbreaks, 1986 to 1995. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1998;212:1874–1881. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources