Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov;13(11):2515-26.
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0319. Epub 2014 Sep 9.

Novel selective estrogen mimics for the treatment of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer

Affiliations

Novel selective estrogen mimics for the treatment of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer

Mary Ellen Molloy et al. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Endocrine-resistant breast cancer is a major clinical obstacle. The use of 17β-estradiol (E2) has reemerged as a potential treatment option following exhaustive use of tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors, although side effects have hindered its clinical usage. Protein kinase C alpha (PKCα) expression was shown to be a predictor of disease outcome for patients receiving endocrine therapy and may predict a positive response to an estrogenic treatment. Here, we have investigated the use of novel benzothiophene selective estrogen mimics (SEM) as an alternative to E2 for the treatment of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer. Following in vitro characterization of SEMs, a panel of clinically relevant PKCα-expressing, tamoxifen-resistant models were used to investigate the antitumor effects of these compounds. SEM treatment resulted in growth inhibition and apoptosis of tamoxifen-resistant cell lines in vitro. In vivo SEM treatment induced tumor regression of tamoxifen-resistant T47D:A18/PKCα and T47D:A18-TAM1 tumor models. T47D:A18/PKCα tumor regression was accompanied by translocation of estrogen receptor (ER) α to extranuclear sites, possibly defining a mechanism through which these SEMs initiate tumor regression. SEM treatment did not stimulate growth of E2-dependent T47D:A18/neo tumors. In addition, unlike E2 or tamoxifen, treatment with SEMs did not stimulate uterine weight gain. These findings suggest the further development of SEMs as a feasible therapeutic strategy for the treatment of endocrine-resistant breast cancer without the side effects associated with E2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PKCα-overexpression in breast cancer cells correlates with sensitivity to E2-induced growth inhibition
A) Effect of E2 and 4-OHT on T47D:A18-TAM1 proliferation in vitro. DNA assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Graph shows mean ± SEM and is representative of three independent experiments. B) Effect of TAM and E2 on T47D:A18-TAM1 xenograft growth. 2 mice/group were bilaterally injected with T47D:A18-TAM1 cells and either left untreated or were given oral TAM (1.5 mg/day). Dashed line represents the start of E2 treatment. C) Western blot analysis of PKCα expression in E2-stimulated (T47D:A18/neo, T47D:A18, MCF-7:WS8) and E2-inhibited (T47D:A18/PKCα, T47D:A18-TAM1, and MCF-7:5C) cell lines. D) Densitometric quantification of three western blots from three independent cell lysates. Student’s t-test was used to compare each E2-inhibited cell line to the E2-stimulated counterpart. *, P ≤ 0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effect of BTC and TTC-352 on proliferation of T47D:A18/neo and T47D:A18/PKCα cells in vitro
Structures of BTC (A) and TTC-352 (B). Effect of BTC and TTC-352 treatment on the growth T47D:A18/neo cells (C and D respectively), T47D:A18/PKCα cells (E and F respectively) and T47D:A18-TAM1 cells (G and H respectively). DNA assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Graphs show mean ± SEM and are representative of three independent experiments.
Figure 3
Figure 3. BTC and TTC-352 inhibit T47D:A18/PKCα and T47D:A18-TAM1 colony formation in 3D Matrigel and induce apoptosis in MCF-7:5C cells in vitro
Colonies were established as described in Materials and Methods and treated for 10 days (Control [0.1% DMSO], E2 1 nM, BTC 100 nM, TTC-352 100 nM). A) T47D:A18/neo. B) T47D:A18/PKCα. C) T47D:A18-TAM1. Proliferation assay was performed following 9 days of treatment. D) MCF-7:WS8. E) MCF-7:5C. F) Apoptosis was assessed in MCF-7:5C cells following 6 days of treatment as described in Materials and Methods. *, P ≤ 0.05 versus DMSO. **, P ≤ 0.01 versus DMSO. ***, P ≤ 0.001 versus DMSO. Graph shows mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.
Figure 4
Figure 4. BTC and TTC-352 induce ERα transcriptional activity in T47D:A18/neo, T47D:A18/PKCα and T47D:A18-TAM1 cell lines
A) T47D:A18/neo, B) T47D:A18/PKCα and C) T47D:A18-TAM1 cell lines. Data is expressed normalized to E2 (100%).*, P ≤ 0.05 versus DMSO. **, P ≤ 0.01 versus DMSO. ***, P ≤ 0.001 versus DMSO. Graph shows mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.
Figure 5
Figure 5. BTC and TTC-352 inhibit T47D:A18/PKCα and T47D:A18-TAM1 xenograft tumors
A) BTC and TTC-352 treatment result in regression of T47D:A18/PKCα tumors. Graph shows percentage of tumor regression (100% ~0.5 cm2). Dotted line indicates when treatment was ended. Arrow designates where tumors from (B) were obtained. *, P ≤ 0.001 versus control. Graph shows mean ± SEM. B) ERα localization in T47D:A18/PKCα tumors by immunofluorescence staining. Total magnification: 630X.C) T47D:A18-TAM1 tumors regress when treated with BTC and TTC-352. Dotted lines represents start of treatment.
Figure 6
Figure 6. BTC and TTC-352 have no effect on T47D:A18/neo tumor growth, body weight or uterine weights of ovariectomized mice
A) BTC and TTC-352 do not result in growth of T47D:A18/neo tumors. B) Body weights of treated mice from (A). C) Uterine weights from mice in (A). Weights are reported as uterine weight (mg)/body weight (g).***, P ≤ 0.001 versus control. Graphs show mean ± SEM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dempsey EC, Newton AC, Mochly-Rosen D, Fields AP, Reyland ME, Insel PA, et al. Protein kinase C isozymes and the regulation of diverse cell responses. American Journal of Physiology - Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology. 2000;279:L429–L38. - PubMed
    1. Mackay HJ, Twelves CJ. Protein kinase C: a target for anticancer drugs? Endocrine-Related Cancer. 2003;10:389–96. - PubMed
    1. Assender JW, Gee JMW, Lewis I, Ellis IO, Robertson JFR, Nicholson RI. Protein kinase C isoform expression as a predictor of disease outcome on endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2007;60:1216–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tonetti DA, Morrow M, Kidwai N, Gupta A, Badve S. Elevated protein kinase C alpha expression may be predictive of tamoxifen treatment failure. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:1400–2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lonne G, Cornmark L, Zahirovic I, Landberg G, Jirstrom K, Larsson C. PKCalpha expression is a marker for breast cancer aggressiveness. Molecular Cancer. 2010;9:76. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types