Developing an Appropriateness Criteria for Knee MRI Using the Rand Appropriateness Method (RAM)-2013
- PMID: 25207313
- PMCID: PMC4151442
Developing an Appropriateness Criteria for Knee MRI Using the Rand Appropriateness Method (RAM)-2013
Abstract
Background: Knee pain is one of the most common reasons patients visit their physician. In this regard Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the tool of preference for diagnosis. The aim of this study was to determine appropriate guidelines for knee MRI administration using the RAND Appropriateness Method (RAM)-2013.
Methods: This qualitative study was done in the Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in 2013. The most appropriate approved knee MRI administration clinical guidelines were evaluated using Guidelines Evaluation and Research Appraisal (AGREE). Panel members consisting of six orthopedic and three rheumatologic doctors gave scores ranging from 1 to 9 for each scenario. The indications were grouped as appropriate, equivocal and inappropriate. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and SPSS ver. 18 software.
Results: Sixty-three scenarios were extracted from the guidelines and then the scenarios were evaluated in 26 indications. Thirty-two (50.79%) cases were considered appropriate, 12 (19.04%) cases uncertain and 19 (30.1%) cases inappropriate.
Conclusions: The RAND appropriateness method is helpful in identifying the opinion of stakeholders in health care systems. Moreover, making practical use of clinical guidelines can improve patients' quality of care and prevent unnecessary costs.
Keywords: Guideline; Knee joint; MRI; RAND Appropriateness Method.
Figures
References
-
- Habashizadeh T, Heravi MT, Makhmalbaf H, Esmaeeli H. Evaluation of MRI results in clinical suspected ACL tears and its comparison with arthroscopic findings in 100 patients approaching the Ghaem Hospital from 2005 up to 2006. Mashhad: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2007.
-
- Greenberg D, Peterburg Y, Vekstein D, Pliskin JS. Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: insights from Israeli medical centers. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(2 ):219–27. - PubMed
-
- Fuchs VR, Sox HC Jr. Physicians' views of the relative importance of thirty medical innovations. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20(5 ):30–42. - PubMed
-
- Passariello R. Cost containment and diffusion of MRI: oil and water?. The situation in Europe. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:259–62. - PubMed
-
- Hillman AL, Schwartz JS. The diffusion of MRI: patterns of siting and ownership in an era of changing incentives. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146(5 ):963–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources