Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015;9(3):277-95.
doi: 10.1080/17437199.2013.876238. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

A review and analysis of the use of 'habit' in understanding, predicting and influencing health-related behaviour

Affiliations
Review

A review and analysis of the use of 'habit' in understanding, predicting and influencing health-related behaviour

Benjamin Gardner. Health Psychol Rev. 2015.

Abstract

The term 'habit' is widely used to predict and explain behaviour. This paper examines use of the term in the context of health-related behaviour, and explores how the concept might be made more useful. A narrative review is presented, drawing on a scoping review of 136 empirical studies and 8 literature reviews undertaken to document usage of the term 'habit', and methods to measure it. A coherent definition of 'habit', and proposals for improved methods for studying it, were derived from findings. Definitions of 'habit' have varied in ways that are often implicit and not coherently linked with an underlying theory. A definition is proposed whereby habit is a process by which a stimulus generates an impulse to act as a result of a learned stimulus-response association. Habit-generated impulses may compete or combine with impulses and inhibitions arising from other sources, including conscious decision-making, to influence responses, and need not generate behaviour. Most research on habit is based on correlational studies using self-report measures. Adopting a coherent definition of 'habit', and a wider range of paradigms, designs and measures to study it, may accelerate progress in habit theory and application.

Keywords: automaticity; behaviour change; habit; review; study design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Hypothesised habit–behaviour relationships and the habit formation process.
Note: Path A: Direct effect of habit strength on behaviour frequency (Triandis, 1977); Path B: Moderating impact of habit on the intention–behaviour relationship (Triandis, 1977); Path C: Effect of behavioural repetition on habit formation (Lally et al., 2010).

Comment in

References

    1. Adriaanse M. A., Oettingen B., Gollwitzer P. M., Hennes E. P., de Ridder D. T. D., de Wit J. B. F. When planning is not enough: Fighting unhealthy snacking habits by mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) European Journal of Social Psychology. 2010:1277–1293. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.730. - DOI
    1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991:179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T. - DOI
    1. Ajzen I. Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2002:107–122. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_02. - DOI
    1. Bargh J. A. The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In: Wyer R. S., Srull T. K., editors. Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1994. pp. 1–40.
    1. Bolman C., Arwert T. G., Vollink T. Adherence to prophylactic asthma medication: Habit strength and cognitions. Heart & Lung. 2011:63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2010.02.003. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources