Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 10:9:114.
doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0114-z.

Feasibility of a rapid response mechanism to meet policymakers' urgent needs for research evidence about health systems in a low income country: a case study

Rhona M Mijumbi, Andrew D Oxman, Ulysses Panisset, Nelson K Sewankambo

Feasibility of a rapid response mechanism to meet policymakers' urgent needs for research evidence about health systems in a low income country: a case study

Rhona M Mijumbi et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Objectives: Despite the recognition of the importance of evidence-informed health policy and practice, there are still barriers to translating research findings into policy and practice. The present study aimed to establish the feasibility of a rapid response mechanism, a knowledge translation strategy designed to meet policymakers' urgent needs for evidence about health systems in a low income country, Uganda. Rapid response mechanisms aim to address the barriers of timeliness and relevance of evidence at the time it is needed.

Methods: A rapid response mechanism (service) designed a priori was offered to policymakers in the health sector in Uganda. In the form of a case study, data were collected about the profile of users of the service, the kinds of requests for evidence, changes in answers, and courses of action influenced by the mechanism and their satisfaction with responses and the mechanism in general.

Results: We found that in the first 28 months, the service received 65 requests for evidence from 30 policymakers and stakeholders, the majority of whom were from the Ministry of Health. The most common requests for evidence were about governance and organization of health systems. It was noted that regular contact between the policymakers and the researchers at the response service was an important factor in response to, and uptake of the service. The service seemed to increase confidence for policymakers involved in the policymaking process.

Conclusion: Rapid response mechanisms designed to meet policymakers' urgent needs for research evidence about health systems are feasible and acceptable to policymakers in low income countries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Development of the REACH-PI rapid response service.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Histogram showing the frequency of receipt of questions by the rapid response service.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cummings M. Coping With the Biomedical Literature: A Primer for the Scientist and the Clinician. New York: Praeger; 1981. The National Library of Medicine; pp. 161–173.
    1. Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med. 2010;7(9):e1000326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1341–1345. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c3020d. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization: The Mexico statement on health research: knowledge for better health: strengthening health systems. 2004, [cited 2011]; Available from: ., [http://www.who.int/rpc/summit/agenda/en/mexico_statement_onhealth_resear...]
    1. The Bamako Call to Action on Research for Health. 2008 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources