Survival follow-up and ipilimumab retreatment of patients with advanced melanoma who received ipilimumab in prior phase II studies
- PMID: 25210016
- PMCID: PMC4990834
- DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu441
Survival follow-up and ipilimumab retreatment of patients with advanced melanoma who received ipilimumab in prior phase II studies
Abstract
Background: This report provides a survival update at a follow-up of >5 years (5.5-6 years) for patients with advanced melanoma who previously received ipilimumab in phase II clinical trials. Safety and efficacy data following ipilimumab retreatment are also reported.
Patients and methods: Patients who previously received ipilimumab 0.3, 3, or 10 mg/kg in one of six phase II trials (CA184-004, CA184-007, CA184-008, CA184-022, MDX010-08, and MDX010-15) were eligible to enroll in the companion study, CA184-025. Upon enrollment, patients initially received ipilimumab retreatment, extended maintenance therapy, or were followed for survival only. Overall survival (OS) rates were evaluated in patients from studies CA184-004, CA184-007, CA184-008, and CA184-022. Safety and best overall response during ipilimumab retreatment at 10 mg/kg were assessed in study CA184-025.
Results: Five-year OS rates for previously treated patients who received ipilimumab induction at 0.3, 3, or 10 mg/kg were 12.3%, 12.3%-16.5%, and 15.5%-28.4%, respectively. Five-year OS rates for treatment-naive patients who received ipilimumab induction at 3 or 10 mg/kg were 26.8% and 21.4%-49.5%, respectively. Little to no change in OS was observed from year 5 up to year 6. The objective response rate among retreated patients was 23%. Grade 3/4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 25%, 5.9%, and 13.2% of retreated patients who initially received ipilimumab 0.3, 3, and 10 mg/kg, with the most common being observed in the skin (4.2%, 2.9%, 3.8%) and gastrointestinal tract (12.5%, 2.9%, 3.8%), respectively.
Conclusions: At a follow-up of 5-6 years, ipilimumab continues to demonstrate durable, long-term survival in a proportion of patients with advanced melanoma. In some patients, ipilimumab retreatment can re-establish disease control with a safety profile that is comparable with that observed during ipilimumab induction. Further studies are needed to determine the contribution of ipilimumab retreatment to OS.
Clinicaltrialsgov: NCT00162123.
Keywords: advanced melanoma; cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4; immunotherapy; ipilimumab; long-term survival; survival rate.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Four-year survival rates for patients with metastatic melanoma who received ipilimumab in phase II clinical trials.Ann Oncol. 2013 Aug;24(8):2174-80. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt161. Epub 2013 May 10. Ann Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23666915 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Therapeutic efficacy of ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody, in patients with metastatic melanoma unresponsive to prior systemic treatments: clinical and immunological evidence from three patient cases.Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009 Aug;58(8):1297-306. doi: 10.1007/s00262-008-0642-y. Epub 2009 Jan 13. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009. PMID: 19139884 Free PMC article.
-
Ipilimumab in treatment-naive and previously treated patients with metastatic melanoma: retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety data from a phase II trial.J Immunother. 2012 Jan;35(1):73-7. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e31823735d6. J Immunother. 2012. PMID: 22130164 Clinical Trial.
-
Ipilimumab and its toxicities: a multidisciplinary approach.Oncologist. 2013 Jun;18(6):733-43. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0483. Epub 2013 Jun 17. Oncologist. 2013. PMID: 23774827 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced melanoma patients with anti-PD-1 progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Transl Oncol. 2021 Sep;23(9):1885-1904. doi: 10.1007/s12094-021-02598-6. Epub 2021 Apr 20. Clin Transl Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33877531
Cited by
-
Prioritization schema for immunotherapy clinical trials in glioblastoma.Oncoimmunology. 2016 Feb 18;5(6):e1145332. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1145332. eCollection 2016 Jun. Oncoimmunology. 2016. PMID: 27471611 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The role of mitochondria in the resistance of melanoma to PD-1 inhibitors.J Transl Med. 2023 May 23;21(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04200-9. J Transl Med. 2023. PMID: 37221594 Free PMC article. Review.
-
MIF Is Necessary for Late-Stage Melanoma Patient MDSC Immune Suppression and Differentiation.Cancer Immunol Res. 2016 Feb;4(2):101-12. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0070-T. Epub 2015 Nov 24. Cancer Immunol Res. 2016. PMID: 26603621 Free PMC article.
-
Current Advancements and Novel Strategies in the Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma.Integr Cancer Ther. 2021 Jan-Dec;20:1534735421990078. doi: 10.1177/1534735421990078. Integr Cancer Ther. 2021. PMID: 33719631 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Five-year survival outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma treated with pembrolizumab in KEYNOTE-001.Ann Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;30(4):582-588. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz011. Ann Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30715153 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Maio M, Bondarenko I, Robert C, et al. Survival analysis with 5 years of follow-up in a phase III study of ipilimumab and dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2013. Presented at the European Cancer Congress 2013, 27 September–1 October 2013 Abstr 3704)
-
- Hoos A, Ibrahim R, Korman A, et al. Development of ipilimumab: contribution to a new paradigm for cancer immunotherapy. Semin Oncol. 2010;37:533–546. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical