Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Nov;52(11):3987-91.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.01793-14. Epub 2014 Sep 10.

PCR-based detection of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in blood and ocular samples for diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

PCR-based detection of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in blood and ocular samples for diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis

C Bourdin et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

PCR detection of Toxoplasma gondii in blood has been suggested as a possibly efficient method for the diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis (OT) and furthermore for genotyping the strain involved in the disease. To assess this hypothesis, we performed PCR with 121 peripheral blood samples from 104 patients showing clinical and/or biological evidence of ocular toxoplasmosis and from 284 (258 patients) controls. We tested 2 different extraction protocols, using either 200 μl (small volume) or 2 ml (large volume) of whole blood. Sensitivity was poor, i.e., 4.1% and 25% for the small- and large-volume extractions, respectively. In comparison, PCR with ocular samples yielded 35.9% sensitivity, while immunoblotting and calculation of the Goldmann-Witmer coefficient yielded 47.6% and 72.3% sensitivities, respectively. Performing these three methods together provided 89.4% sensitivity. Whatever the origin of the sample (ocular or blood), PCR provided higher sensitivity for immunocompromised patients than for their immunocompetent counterparts. Consequently, PCR detection of Toxoplasma gondii in blood samples cannot currently be considered a sufficient tool for the diagnosis of OT, and ocular sampling remains necessary for the biological diagnosis of OT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Flow chart describing the number of patients (patients with ocular toxoplasmosis and control patients) and samples enrolled in the study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bodaghi B, Touitou V, Fardeau C, Paris L, LeHoang P. 2012. Toxoplasmosis: new challenges for an old disease. Eye (Lond.) 26:241–244. 10.1038/eye.2011.331. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCannel CA, Holland GN, Helm CJ, Cornell PJ, Winston JV, Rimmer TG. 1996. Causes of uveitis in the general practice of ophthalmology. UCLA Community-Based Uveitis Study Group. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 121:35–46. - PubMed
    1. Montoya JG, Remington JS. 1996. Toxoplasmic chorioretinitis in the setting of acute acquired toxoplasmosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 23:277–282. 10.1093/clinids/23.2.277. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Delair E, Monnet D, Grabar S, Dupouy-Camet J, Yera H, Brezin AP. 2008. Respective roles of acquired and congenital infections in presumed ocular toxoplasmosis. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 146:851–855. 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.06.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garweg JG, Garweg SD, Flueckiger F, Jacquier P, Boehnke M. 2004. Aqueous humor and serum immunoblotting for immunoglobulin types G, A, M, and E in cases of human ocular toxoplasmosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:4593–4598. 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4593-4598.2004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms