Comparison of complications of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis
- PMID: 25210610
- PMCID: PMC4152188
Comparison of complications of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis
Abstract
Background: A significant number of pregnancies are associated with the cytogenetic abnormalities of the fetus. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) are procedures used for prenatal genetic diagnosis. In this study, we compare the safety and complications of mid-trimester amniocentesis and transabdominal CVS.
Materials and methods: This analytic cross-sectional study was performed in 308 patients from 2.11.2007 to 26.10.2009. We had 155 cases of amniocentesis, which we performed in weeks 15-23 of pregnancy; and 153 cases of CVS, which we performed during weeks 10-14 of pregnancy.
Results: There were 2 cases (1.2%) of premature rupture of membrane (PROM) in amniocentesis which occurred 1 and 10 days after the procedure and caused pregnancy loss before 20 weeks. We had 1 case (0.7%) of abortion in CVS, which occurred 10 days after the procedure. Additionally, there was 1 case of amniotic fluid leakage (0.7%) in which, after admission to the hospital and observation, leakage was stopped and the pregnancy continued normally.
Conclusion: In this study, we had more complications with amniocentesis cases than CVS. CVS is a procedure performed in the earlier stages of pregnancy and its complications are less than amniocentesis. We suggest CVS to be the procedure of choice for genetic diagnosis.
Keywords: Amniocentesis; Chorionic Villus Sampling; Complications; Genetic Testing.
Similar articles
-
Randomised study of risk of fetal loss related to early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling.Lancet. 1997 Sep 6;350(9079):697-703. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02449-5. Lancet. 1997. PMID: 9291904 Clinical Trial.
-
Amniocentesis performed at 14 weeks' gestation or earlier: comparison with first-trimester transabdominal chorionic villus sampling.Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Apr;83(4):543-8. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199404000-00010. Obstet Gynecol. 1994. PMID: 8134064
-
Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling: systematic review of literature and updated meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):442-451. doi: 10.1002/uog.20353. Epub 2019 Sep 6. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31124209
-
Procedure-related complications after genetic amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling.Ultraschall Med. 2013 Aug;34(4):345-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1312939. Epub 2012 Jun 21. Ultraschall Med. 2013. PMID: 22723040
-
Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;17(2):197-201. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000162191.22091.e9. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 15758614 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of Fetal and Maternal Outcomes in Chorion Villus Sampling (CVS).Adv Biomed Res. 2023 May 19;12:133. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_229_22. eCollection 2023. Adv Biomed Res. 2023. PMID: 37434920 Free PMC article.
-
Non-Invasive Determination of the Paternal Inheritance in Pregnancies at Risk for β-Thalassaemia by Analyzing Cell-Free Fetal DNA Using Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing.Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jan 10;26(2):570. doi: 10.3390/ijms26020570. Int J Mol Sci. 2025. PMID: 39859286 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Benn PA, Egan JF, Fang M, Smith- Bindman R. Changes in the utilization of prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(6):1255–1260. - PubMed
-
- Smith GCS. Delivery after pervious cesarean section. In: James DK, Steer PJ, Weiner CP, Gonic B, editors. High risk pregnancy: management options. 3rd ed. New Dehli: Elsevier; 2006. pp. 209–215.
-
- Tahmaspour AR. First trimester screening for chromosomal Anomaly. Yakhteh. 2009;11(Suppl 1)
-
- Cunningham FG, Leveno KL, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse D, Spong C. Williams Obstetrics. 23rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2010. pp. 299–301.
-
- Cunnigham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Gilstrap II LC, Wenstrom KD. Williams Obstetrics. 22nd ed. New York, NY: McGraW Hill; 2005. pp. 328–330.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources