Factors influencing parental involvement among minors seeking an abortion: a qualitative study
- PMID: 25211726
- PMCID: PMC4202942
- DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302116
Factors influencing parental involvement among minors seeking an abortion: a qualitative study
Abstract
Objectives: We explored factors that influenced whether minors involved or excluded a parent when seeking an abortion.
Methods: In the summer of 2010, we conducted interviews with 30 minors who sought an abortion in a state that did not require parental involvement at the time. Interviews were coded and analyzed following the principles of the grounded theory method.
Results: The majority of minors involved a parent. Commonly cited factors were close or supportive parental relationships, a sense that disclosure was inevitable, a need for practical assistance, and compelled disclosure. Motivations for not wanting to involve a parent, although some minors ultimately did, included preservation of the parent-daughter relationship, fear or detachment, and preservation of autonomy.
Conclusions: Minors were motivated to involve parents and other adults who were engaged in their lives at the time of the pregnancy, particularly those who supported them in obtaining an abortion. Motivations to exclude a parent were often based on particular family circumstances or experiences that suggested that involvement would not be helpful, might be harmful, or might restrict a minor's ability to obtain an abortion.
Similar articles
-
Parental involvement in minors' abortion decisions.Fam Plann Perspect. 1992 Sep-Oct;24(5):196-207, 213. Fam Plann Perspect. 1992. PMID: 1426181
-
Exploring Adolescents' and Young Adults' Abortion Disclosure and Adolescents' Experiences Navigating Colorado's Parental Notification Law.J Adolesc Health. 2025 Apr;76(4):665-671. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.12.013. Epub 2025 Jan 27. J Adolesc Health. 2025. PMID: 39895432
-
Adolescent autonomy and minors' legal rights: contraception and abortion.J Appl Dev Psychol. 1982 Oct-Dec;3(4):307-18. doi: 10.1016/0193-3973(82)90003-x. J Appl Dev Psychol. 1982. PMID: 12266643
-
The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.J Policy Anal Manage. 1993 Summer;12(3):498-511. J Policy Anal Manage. 1993. PMID: 10127357 Review.
-
Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States.J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1996 Spring;12(2):475-502. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1996. PMID: 8666732 Review.
Cited by
-
The perceived impact of a post-Dobbs landscape on U.S. adolescents and young adults.Contraception. 2024 Oct;138:110513. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110513. Epub 2024 Jun 13. Contraception. 2024. PMID: 38879071
-
Judicial Bypass for Minors Seeking Abortions in Arkansas Versus Other States.Am J Public Health. 2017 Aug;107(8):1266-1271. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303822. Epub 2017 Jun 22. Am J Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28640684 Free PMC article.
-
The role of community and culture in abortion perceptions, decisions, and experiences among Asian Americans.Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 17;10:982215. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.982215. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36733282 Free PMC article.
-
Young Women's Experiences Obtaining Judicial Bypass for Abortion in Texas.J Adolesc Health. 2019 Jan;64(1):20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Sep 6. J Adolesc Health. 2019. PMID: 30197199 Free PMC article.
-
Parental Involvement Policies for Minors Seeking Abortion in the Southeast and Quality of Care.Sex Res Social Policy. 2022 Mar;19(1):264-272. doi: 10.1007/s13178-021-00539-0. Epub 2021 Feb 13. Sex Res Social Policy. 2022. PMID: 38736735 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kost K, Henshaw SKUS. Teenage Pregnancies, Births and Abortions, 2008: National Trends by Age, Race and Ethnicity. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2012.
-
- State Policies in Brief. Parental Involvement in Minors’ Abortions. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2014.
-
- Jones RK, Jerman J. Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46(1):3–14. - PubMed
-
- Guttmacher Institute. Laws Affecting Reproductive Health and Rights: 2012 State Policy Review. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2012.
-
- Nash E, Gold RB, Rowan A, Rathbun G, Vierboom Y. Laws Affecting Reproductive Health and Rights: 2013 State Policy Review. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2013.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources