Should HIV be a notifiable disease? Old questions with some new arguments
- PMID: 25212399
- DOI: 10.7196/samj.8468
Should HIV be a notifiable disease? Old questions with some new arguments
Abstract
HIV notification enters national debate regularly, often introduced by politicians and supported by many individual healthcare workers. We argue that its proponents advance confused or poorly informed rationales for making HIV notifiable. We present reasons why making HIV notifiable would be inappropriate in South Africa, why the public health benefits of a notification programme are not even likely, and why there are risks of public health and human rights harms.
Similar articles
-
Making AIDS a notifiable disease--is it an appropriate policy for South Africa?S Afr Med J. 1999 Jun;89(6):609-11. S Afr Med J. 1999. PMID: 10443205 No abstract available.
-
[HIV should not become a notifiable disease].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Dec 1;151(48):2673. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007. PMID: 18179085 Dutch.
-
Human rights and public health: dichotomies or synergies in developing countries? Examining the case of HIV in South Africa.J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Winter;30(4):677-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2002.tb00435.x. J Law Med Ethics. 2002. PMID: 12561273 No abstract available.
-
Confinement for extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: balancing protection of health systems, individual rights and the public's health.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009 Oct;13(10):1200-9. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009. PMID: 19793423 Review.
-
Provision of antiretroviral therapy in South Africa: the nuts and bolts.Antivir Ther. 2014;19 Suppl 3:105-16. doi: 10.3851/IMP2905. Epub 2014 Oct 13. Antivir Ther. 2014. PMID: 25310359 Review.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical