Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Sep 11;6(11):a016261.
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016261.

Transcriptional control of inflammatory responses

Affiliations
Review

Transcriptional control of inflammatory responses

Stephen T Smale et al. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. .

Abstract

The inflammatory response requires the activation of a complex transcriptional program that is both cell-type- and stimulus-specific and involves the dynamic regulation of hundreds of genes. In the context of an inflamed tissue, extensive changes in gene expression occur in both parenchymal cells and infiltrating cells of the immune system. Recently, basic transcriptional mechanisms that control inflammation have been clarified at a genome scale, particularly in macrophages and conventional dendritic cells. The regulatory logic of distinct groups of inflammatory genes can be explained to some extent by identifiable sequence-encoded features of their chromatin organization, which impact on transcription factor (TF) accessibility and impose different requirements for gene activation. Moreover, it has become apparent that the interplay between TFs activated by inflammatory stimuli and master regulators exerts a crucial role in controlling cell-type-specific transcriptional outputs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
DNA recognition specificities of TFs that control inflammatory gene expression. Representative examples are shown.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The relationship between nucleosomes, lineage-determining TFs, and TFs activated by inflammatory stimuli. (Left) A poised enhancer in which nucleosome depletion and deposition of H3K4me1 is induced by Pu.1 during differentiation. In response to stimulation TFs, such as NF-κB, are recruited to the nucleosome-depleted area maintained by Pu.1. (Right) Latent enhancers are not detectable in terminally differentiated cells until a stimulus is delivered that activates TFs (such as Stat TFs) collaborating with Pu.1 to reconfigure local chromatin.

References

    1. Angelov D, Lenouvel F, Hans F, Muller CW, Bouvet P, Bednar J, Moudrianakis EN, Cadet J, Dimitrov S 2004. The histone octamer is invisible when NF-κB binds to the nucleosome. J Biol Chem 279: 42374–42382. - PubMed
    1. Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, Schones DE, Wang Z, Wei G, Chepelev I, Zhao K 2007. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129: 823–837. - PubMed
    1. Bernstein BE, Meissner A, Lander ES 2007. The mammalian epigenome. Cell 128: 669–681. - PubMed
    1. Bhatt DM, Pandya-Jones A, Tong AJ, Barozzi I, Lissner MM, Natoli G, Black DL, Smale ST 2012. Transcript dynamics of proinflammatory genes revealed by sequence analysis of subcellular RNA fractions. Cell 150: 279–290. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Creyghton MP, Cheng AW, Welstead GG, Kooistra T, Carey BW, Steine EJ, Hanna J, Lodato MA, Frampton GM, Sharp PA, et al. 2011. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 21931–21936. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms