Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jan;134(1):3-11.
doi: 10.1007/s00439-014-1482-9. Epub 2014 Sep 12.

Using drug response data to identify molecular effectors, and molecular "omic" data to identify candidate drugs in cancer

Affiliations
Review

Using drug response data to identify molecular effectors, and molecular "omic" data to identify candidate drugs in cancer

William C Reinhold et al. Hum Genet. 2015 Jan.

Erratum in

Abstract

The current convergence of molecular and pharmacological data provides unprecedented opportunities to gain insights into the relationships between the two types of data. Multiple forms of large-scale molecular data, including but not limited to gene and microRNA transcript expression, DNA somatic and germline variations from next-generation DNA and RNA sequencing, and DNA copy number from array comparative genomic hybridization are all potentially informative when one attempts to recognize the panoply of potentially influential events both for cancer progression and therapeutic outcome. Concurrently, there has also been a substantial expansion of the pharmacological data being accrued in a systematic fashion. For cancer cell lines, the National Cancer Institute cell line panel (NCI-60), the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE), and the collaborative Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) databases all provide subsets of these forms of data. For the patient-derived data, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) provides analogous forms of genomic information along with treatment histories. Integration of these data in turn relies on the fields of statistics and statistical learning. Multiple algorithmic approaches may be chosen, depending on the data being considered, and the nature of the question being asked. Combining these algorithms with prior biological knowledge, the results of molecular biological studies, and the consideration of genes as pathways or functional groups provides both the challenge and the potential of the field. The ultimate goal is to provide a paradigm shift in the way that drugs are selected to provide a more targeted and efficacious outcome for the patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bio statistical methods used for the determination of biomarkers for drug response. Complexity increases from left to right.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A schematic representation of the various databases that might be used to move towards providing hypothesis for selection of pharmacological agents. Acronyms: CCLE: Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia; GDSC: Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer; NCI-60: the sixty cell lines of the US National Cancer Institute; TCGA: The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abaan OD, Polley EC, Davis SR, Zhu YJ, Bilke S, Walker RL, Pineda M, Gindin Y, Jiang Y, Reinhold WC, Holbeck SL, Simon RM, Doroshow JH, Pommier Y, Meltzer PS. The Exomes of the NCI-60 Panel: A Genomic Resource for Cancer Biology and Systems Pharmacology. Cancer Research. 2013;73:4372–82. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3342. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adams S, Robbins FM, Chen D, Wagage D, Holbeck SL, Morse HC, 3rd, Stroncek D, Marincola FM. HLA class I and II genotype of the NCI-60 cell lines. J Transl Med. 2005;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-3-11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aksoy BA, Demir E, Babur O, Wang W, Jing X, Schultz N, Sander C. Prediction of individualized therapeutic vulnerabilities in cancer from genomic profiles. Bioinformatics. 2014 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu164. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Algeciras-Schimnich A, Pietras EM, Barnhart BC, Legembre P, Vijayan S, Holbeck SL, Peter ME. Two CD95 tumor classes with different sensitivities to antitumor drugs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:11445–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2034995100. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amundson SA, Do KT, Vinikoor LC, Lee RA, Koch-Paiz CA, Ahn J, Reimers M, Chen Y, Scudiero DA, Weinstein JN, Trent JM, Bittner ML, Meltzer PS, Fornace AJ., Jr Integrating global gene expression and radiation survival parameters across the 60 cell lines of the National Cancer Institute Anticancer Drug Screen. Cancer Res. 2008;68:415–24. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2120. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types