Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 1;11(Summer):1e.
eCollection 2014.

Personal health records: is rapid adoption hindering interoperability?

Affiliations

Personal health records: is rapid adoption hindering interoperability?

Jana Studeny et al. Perspect Health Inf Manag. .

Abstract

The establishment of the Meaningful Use criteria has created a critical need for robust interoperability of health records. A universal definition of a personal health record (PHR) has not been agreed upon. Standardized code sets have been built for specific entities, but integration between them has not been supported. The purpose of this research study was to explore the hindrance and promotion of interoperability standards in relationship to PHRs to describe interoperability progress in this area. The study was conducted following the basic principles of a systematic review, with 61 articles used in the study. Lagging interoperability has stemmed from slow adoption by patients, creation of disparate systems due to rapid development to meet requirements for the Meaningful Use stages, and rapid early development of PHRs prior to the mandate for integration among multiple systems. Findings of this study suggest that deadlines for implementation to capture Meaningful Use incentive payments are supporting the creation of PHR data silos, thereby hindering the goal of high-level interoperability.

Keywords: interoperability; meaningful use; personal health record; regional health information organization (RHIO).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process of Personal Health Record (PHR) Adoption in Healthcare

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Archer N., Fevrier-Thomas U., Lokker C., McKibbon K. A., Straus S. E. Personal Health Records: A Scoping Review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2011;18(4):515–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coffield R. L., Ishee J., Kapp J. L., Lyles K. D., Williams R. L. Personal Health Records: History, Evolution, and the Implications of ARRA. American Health Lawyers Association; 2011. Available at http://www.healthlawyers.org/Events/Programs/Materials/Documents/AM11/AH... (accessed October 2, 2013).
    1. Halamka J. D., Mandl K. D., Tang P. C. Early Experiences with Personal Health Records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2006;13(2):121–26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Markle Foundation. Connecting Americans to Their Health Care: A Common Framework for Networked Personal Health Information. 2006. Available at. http://www.markle.org/sites/default/files/CF-Consumers-Full.pdf (accessed September 26, 2013).
    1. Maloney F. L., Wright A. USB-based Personal Health Records: An Analysis of Features and Functionality. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2010;79(2):97–111. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources