Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;2(3):175-8.
doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2011.03.003.

Comparison of Airtraq optical laryngoscope and Storz video laryngoscope in a cadaver model

Michael C Wadman  1 , Travis W Dierks  1 , Chad E Branecki  1 , Claudia L Barthold  1 , Lance H Hoffman  1 , Lina Lander  1 , Carol S Lomneth  1 , Richard A Walker  1
Affiliations

Comparison of Airtraq optical laryngoscope and Storz video laryngoscope in a cadaver model

Michael C Wadman et al. World J Emerg Med. 2011.

Abstract

Background: Airway management in the emergency department is a critical intervention that requires both standard techniques and rescue techniques to ensure a high rate of success. Recently, video laryngoscope (VL) systems have become increasingly common in many large urban EDs, but these systems may exceed the budgets of smaller rural EDs and EMS services and the Airtraq optical laryngoscope (OL) may provide an effective, low-cost alternative. We hypothesized that laryngeal view and time to endothracheal tube placement for OL and VL intubations would not be significantly different.

Methods: This was a prospective, crossover trial.

Setting: University-based emergency medicine residency program procedure laboratory utilizing lightly embalmed cadavers.

Subjects: PGY1-3 emergency medicine residents. The study subjects performed timed endotracheal intubations alternately using the OL and VL. The subjects then rated the Cormack-Lehane laryngeal view for each device.

Statistical analysis: Mean time to intubation and the mean laryngeal view score were calculated with 95% confidence intervals and statistical significance was determined by Student's t test.

Results: Fourteen subjects completed the study. The average laryngeal view achieved with the OL vs. the VL was not significantly different, with Cormack-Lehane grade of 1.14 vs. 1.07, respectively. Time to endotracheal intubation, however, was significantly different (P<0.001) with the average time to intubation for the OL 25.49 seconds (95% CI: 17.95-33.03) and the VL 13.41 seconds (10.27-16.55).

Conclusion: The Airtraq OL and the Storz VL yielded similar laryngeal views in the lightly embalmed cadaver model. Time to endotracheal tube placement, however, was less for the VL.

Keywords: Airtraq optical laryngoscope; Laryngoscope; Video laryngoscope.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no commercial associations or sources of support that might pose a conflict of interest.

References

    1. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Inoue T, Sakamoto A. Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:429–437. - PubMed
    1. Petrini F, Accorsi A, Adrario A. Recommendations for airway control and difficult airway management. Minerva Anes. 2005;71:617–657. - PubMed
    1. Andersen SD. Practical light embalming technique for use in the surgical fresh tissue dissection laboratory. Clin Anat. 2006;19:8–11. - PubMed
    1. Adnet F, Baillard C, Borron SW, Denantes C, Lefebvre L, Galinski M, et al. Randomized study comparing the “sniffing position” with simple head extension for laryngoscopic view in elective surgery patients. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:836–841. - PubMed
    1. Savodelli GL, Schiffer E, Abegg C, Baeriswyl V, Clergue F. Comparison of the Glidescope®, the McGrath®, the Airtraq® and the Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airways. Anesthesia. 2008;63:1358–1364. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources