Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;4(2):98-106.
doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2013.02.003.

Evaluating the management of anaphylaxis in US emergency departments: Guidelines vs. practice

Affiliations

Evaluating the management of anaphylaxis in US emergency departments: Guidelines vs. practice

W Scott Russell et al. World J Emerg Med. 2013.

Abstract

Background: Anaphylaxis is characterized by acute episodes of potentially life-threatening symptoms that are often treated in the emergency setting. Current guidelines recommend: 1) quick diagnosis using standard criteria; 2) first-line treatment with epinephrine; and 3) discharge with a prescription for an epinephrine auto-injector, written instructions regarding long-term management, and a referral (preferably, allergy) for follow-up. However, studies suggest low concordance with guideline recommendations by emergency medicine (EM) providers. The study aimed to evaluate how emergency departments (EDs) in the United States (US) manage anaphylaxis in relation to guideline recommendations.

Methods: This was an online anonymous survey of a random sample of EM health providers in US EDs.

Results: Data analysis included 207 EM providers. For respondent EDs, approximately 9% reported using agreed-upon clinical criteria to diagnose anaphylaxis; 42% reported administering epinephrine in the ED for most anaphylaxis episodes; and <50% provided patients with a prescription for an epinephrine auto-injector and/or an allergist referral on discharge. Most provided some written materials, and follow-up with a primary care clinician was recommended.

Conclusions: This is the first cross-sectional survey to provide "real-world" data showing that practice in US EDs is discordant with current guideline recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with anaphylaxis. The primary gaps are low (or no) utilization of standard criteria for defining anaphylaxis and inconsistent use of epinephrine. Prospective research is recommended.

Keywords: Allergic reaction; Anaphylaxis; Emergency department; Epinephrine (adrenaline); Epinephrine autoinjector; Guidelines; Life-threatening reaction; Self-injectable epinephrine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no competing interests relevant to the present study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Use of a written definition of anaphylaxis in US EDs. Respondents answered the question: Does your department have a written definition of anaphylaxis? (n=204).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of patients seen in the ED for anaphylaxis who were treated with epinephrine while in the ED. Respondents answered the question: What percentage of patients treated for anaphylaxis in your ED receive epinephrine as part of their acute care management? (n=196).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of patients seen in the ED for anaphylaxis who were discharged with a prescription for self-injectable epinephrine. Respondents answered the question: What percentage of patients treated for anaphylaxis in your ED is discharged with a prescription for self-injectable epinephrine? (n=197).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The likelihood of anaphylaxis patient subgroups being discharged with a prescription for self-injectable epinephrine. Respondents answered the question: Are there particular patient populations you are more likely to prescribe self-injectable epinephrine to at discharge? (n=188).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Percentage of patients seen in the ED for anaphylaxis, who were given a referral to see a physician at discharge. Respondents answered the question,What percentage of patients treated for anaphylaxis in your ED are discharged with a referral to a primary care physician (PCP) and/or to an allergist? (n=198 respondents).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bohlke K, Davis RI, DeStefano F, Marcy SM, Braun MM, Thompson RS, et al. Epidemiology of anaphylaxis among children and adolescents enrolled in a health maintenance organization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113:536–542. - PubMed
    1. Clark S, Camargo CA., Jr Epidemiology of anaphylaxis. Immunol Allergy Clin N Am. 2007;27:145–163. - PubMed
    1. Simons FE, Ardusso LR, Bilo MB, El-Gamal YM, Ledford DK, Ring J, et al. World Allergy Organization guidelines for the assessment and management of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127:593.e1–e22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lieberman P, Nicklas RA, Oppenheimer J, Kemp SF, Lang DM, Bernstein DI, et al. The diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis practice parameter: 2010 update. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126:477–480. - PubMed
    1. Sampson HA, Munoz-Furlong A, Campbell R, Adkinson NF, Jr, Bock SA, Branum A, et al. Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47:373–380. Also published in J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 117: 391-397. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources