Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 12;9(9):e106043.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106043. eCollection 2014.

Lexis diagram and illness-death model: simulating populations in chronic disease epidemiology

Affiliations

Lexis diagram and illness-death model: simulating populations in chronic disease epidemiology

Ralph Brinks et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Chronic diseases impose a tremendous global health problem of the 21st century. Epidemiological and public health models help to gain insight into the distribution and burden of chronic diseases. Moreover, the models may help to plan appropriate interventions against risk factors. To provide accurate results, models often need to take into account three different time-scales: calendar time, age, and duration since the onset of the disease. Incidence and mortality often change with age and calendar time. In many diseases such as, for example, diabetes and dementia, the mortality of the diseased persons additionally depends on the duration of the disease. The aim of this work is to describe an algorithm and a flexible software framework for the simulation of populations moving in an illness-death model that describes the epidemiology of a chronic disease in the face of the different times-scales. We set up a discrete event simulation in continuous time involving competing risks using the freely available statistical software R. Relevant events are birth, the onset (or diagnosis) of the disease and death with or without the disease. The Lexis diagram keeps track of the different time-scales. Input data are birth rates, incidence and mortality rates, which can be given as numerical values on a grid. The algorithm manages the complex interplay between the rates and the different time-scales. As a result, for each subject in the simulated population, the algorithm provides the calendar time of birth, the age of onset of the disease (if the subject contracts the disease) and the age at death. By this means, the impact of interventions may be estimated and compared.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Three states model of normal (healthy), diseased and dead subjects.
The transition rates may depend on calender time formula image age formula image and in case of formula image also on the duration formula image of the disease.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Three-dimensional Lexis diagram with two life lines.
Abscissa, ordinate and applicate (z-axis) represent calendar time formula image, age formula image and duration formula image, respectively. The life lines start at birth formula image and end at death formula image The first subject (blue line segments) contracts the disease at formula image. Then, the life line changes its direction. The second subject (red line segment) does not contract the disease, the life line remains in the t-a-plane.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Theoretical and simulated age-specific prevalence.
Simulation 1 comprises formula image persons. The resulting age-specific prevalence (black crosses) is compared to the analytically calculated prevalence (blue solid line). The example shows the very good agreement between the simulation and the theoretical results.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Histograms of the age of onset and age at death in a hypothetical chronic disease.
In Simulation 2 the empirical distributions of the age of onset (left) and the age at death of the diseased persons (right) are estimated.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Calculated and simulated prevalence in Simulation 2.
If we mimic a cross-sectional study at year formula image we obtain the age-specific prevalence as indicated by the black bars (with 95% confidence bounds). For comparison the analytically calculated age-specific prevalence is shown as blue line.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Esimtated densities of the gain in life-years in two intervention programmes.
Simulation 4 compares two intervention programmes in a population of 120000 persons. The estimated densities of the total gain in life-years (compared to a basecase) are shown as red and blue curve for programmes A and B, respectively.

References

    1. WHO (2011). Noncommunicable diseases country profiles. URL http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241502283eng.pdf. Last access: May 20st, 2014.
    1. Keiding N (2006) Event history analysis and the cross-section. Statistics in Medicine 25: 2343–2364. - PubMed
    1. Carstenson B, Kristensen JK, Ottosen P, Borch-Johnsen K (2008) The Danish National Diabetes Register: Trends in Incidence, Prevalence and Mortality. Diabetologia 51: 2187–2196. - PubMed
    1. Fox C, Sullivan L, Sr RD, Wilson P (2004) The significant effect of diabetes duration on coronary heart disease mortality: the framingham heart study. Diabetes Care 27: 704–708. - PubMed
    1. Rait G, Walters K, Bottomley C, Petersen I, Iliffe S, et al. (2010) Survival of people with clinical diagnosis of dementia in primary care: cohort study. BMJ 341: c3584. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types