Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Dec;11(4):363-75.
doi: 10.1007/s11904-014-0228-6.

Combination HIV prevention interventions: the potential of integrated behavioral and biomedical approaches

Affiliations
Review

Combination HIV prevention interventions: the potential of integrated behavioral and biomedical approaches

Jennifer L Brown et al. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Combination HIV prevention interventions that integrate efficacious behavioral and biomedical strategies offer the potential to reduce new HIV infections. We overview the efficacy data for three biomedical HIV prevention approaches, namely microbicides, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and HIV vaccination; review factors associated with differential acceptability and uptake of these methods; and suggest strategies to optimize the effectiveness and dissemination of combination HIV prevention approaches. A narrative review was conducted highlighting key efficacy data for microbicides, PrEP, and an HIV vaccination and summarizing acceptability data for each of the three biomedical HIV prevention approaches. Recommendations for the integration and dissemination of combined behavioral and biomedical HIV prevention approaches are provided. To date, microbicides and an HIV vaccination have demonstrated limited efficacy for the prevention of HIV. However, PrEP has demonstrated efficacy in reducing HIV incident infections. A diverse array of factors influences both hypothetical willingness and actual usage of each biomedical prevention method. Strategies to effectively integrate and evaluate combination HIV prevention interventions are urgently needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

Jennifer L. Brown, Jessica M. Sales, Ralph J. DiClemente declare that they have no conflict of interest

References

    1. CDC. Estimated HIV incidence among adults and adolescents in the United States, 2007–2010. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report. 2012:17.
    1. WHO. Core epidemiological slides: HIV/AIDS estimates. 2013.
    1. Kurth AE, Celum C, Baeten JM, Vermund SH, Wasserheit JN. Combination HIV prevention: significance, challenges, and opportunities. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2011;8:62–72. This article overviews potential strategies to develop, evaluate, and implement combination HIV prevention approaches and notes currently funded combination HIV prevention trials. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alsallaq RA, Baeten JM, Celum CL, Hughes JP, Abu-Raddad LJ, Barnabas RV, et al. Understanding the Potential Impact of a Combination HIV Prevention Intervention in a Hyper-Endemic Community. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:1–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Degenhardt L, Mathers B, Vickerman P, Rhodes T, Latkin C, Hickman M. Prevention of HIV infection for people who inject drugs: why individual, structural, and combination approaches are needed. Lancet. 2010;376:285–301. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms