Genetic heterogeneity in Alzheimer disease and implications for treatment strategies
- PMID: 25217249
- PMCID: PMC4162987
- DOI: 10.1007/s11910-014-0499-8
Genetic heterogeneity in Alzheimer disease and implications for treatment strategies
Abstract
Since the original publication describing the illness in 1907, the genetic understanding of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has advanced such that it is now clear that it is a genetically heterogeneous condition, the subtypes of which may not uniformly respond to a given intervention. It is therefore critical to characterize the clinical and preclinical stages of AD subtypes, including the rare autosomal dominant forms caused by known mutations in the PSEN1, APP, and PSEN2 genes that are being studied in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network study and its associated secondary prevention trial. Similar efforts are occurring in an extended Colombian family with a PSEN1 mutation, in APOE ε4 homozygotes, and in Down syndrome. Despite commonalities in the mechanisms producing the AD phenotype, there are also differences that reflect specific genetic origins. Treatment modalities should be chosen and trials designed with these differences in mind. Ideally, the varying pathological cascades involved in the different subtypes of AD should be defined so that both areas of overlap and of distinct differences can be taken into account. At the very least, clinical trials should determine the influence of known genetic factors in post hoc analyses.
Conflict of interest statement
Nigel J. Cairns declares that he has no conflict of interest.
John M. Ringman has received a grant and paid travel expenses from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network.
Alison Goate received grants from the National Institute on Aging during the conduct of the study, and received personal fees from Finnegan HC, Cognition Therapeutics, Dickstein Shapiro, Genentech, and Amgen and grants from Genentech, Pfizer, and Astra Zeneca outside the submitted work; In addition, she has a patent (US20070258898) issued, and a patent with Taconic with royalties paid.
Colin L. Masters has received consultancy fees from Eli Lilly and has stock in Prana Biotechnology.
Neill Graff-Radford has received a National Institutes ofHealth grant (Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network study) and a grant from Eli Lilly.
Bernardino Ghetti has received consultancy fees, honoraria payments, and paid travel expenses from Piramal Imaging.
John C. Morris has received the following grants: P01AG026276, P01AG026276, P01AG03991, and P50 AG05681. He has also received consultancy fees from Lilly USA, andpayment for lectures from Eisai (South Korea), University of California, Los Angles (Cherkin Award lecture), Genentech, Lilly USA, Northwestern University Grand Rounds, Albert Einstein Grand Rounds, and the Korean Dementia Association. He has also received book royalties from Blackwell Medical Publishing and Taylor and Francis. Dr. Danek has received compensation for travel and a talk from GE Healthcare, compensation for a professional presentation by Merz, and royalties from a book.
References
-
- Alzheimer A, Stelzmann RA, Schnitzlein HN, Murtagh FR. An English translation of Alzheimer's 1907 paper, "Uber eine eigenartige Erkankung der Hirnrinde". Clin Anat. 1995;8:429–31. - PubMed
-
- Katzman R. Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:964–73. - PubMed
-
- Gatz M, Reynolds CA, Fratiglioni L, et al. Role of genes and environments for explaining Alzheimer disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:168–74. - PubMed
-
- Lowenberg K, Waggoner RW. Familial organic psychosis (Alzheimer's type) Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1934;31:737–54.
-
- St George-Hyslop PH, Haines JL, Farrer LA, et al. Genetic linkage studies suggest that Alzheimer's disease is not a single homogeneous disorder. Nature. 1990;347:194–7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
