Health in All Policies (HiAP) framework for country action
- PMID: 25217354
- DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dau035
Health in All Policies (HiAP) framework for country action
Abstract
This document serves as a 'starter's kit' for applying Health in All Policies (HiAP) in decision-making and implementation at national and subnational levels. It can be easily adapted for use in different country contexts and at the regional and global levels. WHAT IS HIAP?: HiAP is an approach to public policies across sectors that systematically takes into account the health implications of decisions, seeks synergies and avoids harmful health impacts in order to improve population health and health equity. As a concept, it reflects the principles of: legitimacy, accountability, transparency and access to information, participation, sustainability and collaboration across sectors and levels of government.
Why it matters: Health and health equity are values in their own right and are also important prerequisites for achieving many other societal goals. Many of the determinants of health and health inequities in populations have social, environmental and economic origins that extend beyond the direct influence of the health sector and health policies. Thus, public policies in all sectors and at different levels of governance can have a significant impact on population health and health equity.
How to implement the framework: The Framework sets out six key components that should be addressed in order to put the HiAP approach into action: (1) establish the need and priorities for HiAP, (2) frame planned action, (3) identify supportive structures and processes, (4) facilitate assessment and engagement, (5) ensure monitoring, evaluation and reporting, (6) build capacity. These components are not fixed in order or priority. Rather, individual countries will adopt and adjust the components in ways that are most relevant for their specific governance, economic and social contexts.
Roles and responsibilities: Although governments as a whole bear the ultimate responsibility for the health of their citizens, health authorities at all levels are key actors in promoting HiAP. They should therefore actively seek opportunities to collaborate with and influence other sectors. Intergovernmental organizations and structures (multi-lateral, bilateral, regional, etc.) can provide significant support to multi-sectoral action on health and development outcomes. Finally, having taken a lead role in multi-sectoral initiatives on issues such as marketing of breast-milk substitutes, tobacco control and the international recruitment of health personnel, the World Health Organization (WHO) has a special contribution to make to HiAP at both international and country levels.
© World Health Organization 2013. Reprinted with permission of the publisher.
Similar articles
-
Urban health: an example of a "health in all policies" approach in the context of SDGs implementation.Global Health. 2019 Dec 18;15(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0529-z. Global Health. 2019. PMID: 31856877 Free PMC article.
-
Process of developing the National Health in All Policies Framework to address social determinants of health in Tanzania Mainland: lessons learned, 2018 - 2022.Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Jun 8;45(Suppl 1):4. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2023.45.1.39693. eCollection 2023. Pan Afr Med J. 2023. PMID: 37538361 Free PMC article.
-
The implementation of Health in All Policies initiatives: a systems framework for government action.Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Mar 15;16(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0295-z. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018. PMID: 29544496 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review of the implementation of health in all policies at the local level.Health Policy. 2018 Mar;122(3):284-292. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 20. Health Policy. 2018. PMID: 29305241
-
[The concept of social determinants of health in health promotion policies in Thailand, Sweden, England, USA, and Japan: A narrative review].Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2022 May 24;69(5):338-356. doi: 10.11236/jph.21-105. Epub 2022 Mar 16. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2022. PMID: 35296593 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Spatial patterns in sociodemographic factors explain to a large extent the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes in Aragon (Spain).Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 25;10:1016157. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1016157. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 36760398 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review to Update 'Value of a Statistical Life' Estimates for Australia.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 7;18(11):6168. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116168. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34200344 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived barriers to physical activity behaviour among patients with diabetes and hypertension in Kosovo: a qualitative study.BMC Prim Care. 2022 Sep 30;23(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01866-w. BMC Prim Care. 2022. PMID: 36180857 Free PMC article.
-
Community and health staff perceptions on non-communicable disease management in El Salvador's health system: a qualitative study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 27;20(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05249-8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 32460769 Free PMC article.
-
Blending integrated knowledge translation with global health governance: an approach for advancing action on a wicked problem.Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 4;17(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0424-3. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019. PMID: 30832660 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials