Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States
- PMID: 25217577
- PMCID: PMC4200066
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju255
Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States
Abstract
Background: National legislation is under consideration that would require women with mammographically dense breasts to be informed of their breast density and encouraged to discuss supplemental breast cancer screening with their health care providers. The number of US women potentially affected by this legislation is unknown.
Methods: We determined the mammographic breast density distribution by age and body mass index (BMI) using data from 1518 599 mammograms conducted from 2007 through 2010 at mammography facilities in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC). We applied these breast density distributions to age- and BMI-specific counts of the US female population derived from the 2010 US Census and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to estimate the number of US women with dense breasts.
Results: Overall, 43.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 43.1% to 43.4%) of women 40 to 74 years of age had heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts, and this proportion was inversely associated with age and BMI. Based on the age and BMI distribution of US women, we estimated that 27.6 million women (95% CI = 27.5 to 27.7 million) aged 40 to 74 years in the United States have heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts. Women aged 40 to 49 years (N = 12.3 million) accounted for 44.3% of this group.
Conclusion: The prevalence of dense breasts among US women of common breast cancer screening ages exceeds 25 million. Policymakers and healthcare providers should consider this large prevalence when debating breast density notification legislation and designing strategies to ensure that women who are notified have opportunities to evaluate breast cancer risk and discuss and pursue supplemental screening options if deemed appropriate.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 31;3(3):CD009632. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009632.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 36999589 Free PMC article.
-
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
-
Breast Cancer Screening Using Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Breast Density.JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Oct 1;184(10):1222-1231. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.4224. JAMA Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 39186304 Free PMC article.
-
Racial Differences in Screening Eligibility by Breast Density After State-Level Insurance Expansion.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2525216. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.25216. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 40762915 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for breast cancer: a systematic review update to inform the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline.Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;13(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02700-3. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39702409 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art.Radiology. 2021 Apr;299(1):36-48. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021201948. Epub 2021 Mar 2. Radiology. 2021. PMID: 33650905 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Variation in Mammographic Breast Density Assessments Among Radiologists in Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Observational Study.Ann Intern Med. 2016 Oct 4;165(7):457-464. doi: 10.7326/M15-2934. Epub 2016 Jul 19. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27428568 Free PMC article.
-
Breast Density Legislation and the Promise Not Attained.J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Feb;34(2):167-168. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4754-6. J Gen Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 30478631 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Enhanced Detection of Suspicious Breast Lesions: A Comparative Study of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Automated Breast Ultrasound in 117 Patients with Core Needle Biopsy.Med Sci Monit. 2023 Sep 10;29:e941072. doi: 10.12659/MSM.941072. Med Sci Monit. 2023. PMID: 37689969 Free PMC article.
-
A web-based personalized risk communication and decision-making tool for women with dense breasts: Design and methods of a randomized controlled trial within an integrated health care system.Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 May;56:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 28. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017. PMID: 28257920 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(3):227–236 - PubMed
-
- Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA. 1996;276(1):33–38 - PubMed
-
- Buist DS, Porter PL, Lehman C, Taplin SH, White E. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40–49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(19):1432–1440 - PubMed
-
- Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):168–175 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical