Improving the reporting of clinical trials of infertility treatments (IMPRINT): modifying the CONSORT statement†‡
- PMID: 25217611
- PMCID: PMC4481576
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu218
Improving the reporting of clinical trials of infertility treatments (IMPRINT): modifying the CONSORT statement†‡
Abstract
Clinical trials testing infertility treatments often do not report on the major outcomes of interest to patients and clinicians and the public (such as live birth) nor on the harms, including maternal risks during pregnancy and fetal anomalies. This is complicated by the multiple participants in infertility trials which may include a woman (mother), a man (father), and result in a third individual if successful, their offspring (child), who is also the desired outcome of treatment. The primary outcome of interest and many adverse events occur after cessation of infertility treatment and during pregnancy and the puerperium, which create a unique burden of follow-up for clinical trial investigators and participants. In 2013, because of the inconsistencies in trial reporting and the unique aspects of infertility trials not adequately addressed by existing Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statements, we convened a consensus conference in Harbin, China, with the aim of planning modifications to the CONSORT checklist to improve the quality of reporting of clinical trials testing infertility treatment. The consensus group recommended that the preferred primary outcome of all infertility trials is live birth (defined as any delivery of a live infant ≥20 weeks gestations) or cumulative live birth, defined as the live birth per women over a defined time period (or number of treatment cycles). In addition, harms to all participants should be systematically collected and reported, including during the intervention, any resulting pregnancy, and during the neonatal period. Routine information should be collected and reported on both male and female participants in the trial. We propose to track the change in quality that these guidelines may produce in published trials testing infertility treatments. Our ultimate goal is to increase the transparency of benefits and risks of infertility treatments to provide better medical care to affected individuals and couples.
Keywords: CONSORT; IMPRINT; infertility trial; modification; reporting.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Comment in
-
Reply: Improving the Reporting of Clinical Trials of Infertility Treatments (IMPRINT): modifying the CONSORT statement-what about registration studies?Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):490-1. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu313. Epub 2014 Dec 9. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 25492412 No abstract available.
-
Improving the Reporting of Clinical Trials of Infertility Treatments (IMPRINT): modifying the CONSORT statement-what about registration studies?Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):490. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu311. Epub 2014 Dec 9. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 25492413 No abstract available.
References
-
- Battaglia FC, Lubchenco LO. A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr. 1967;71:159–163. - PubMed
-
- Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P, Group C. Methods and processes of the CONSORT Group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:W60–W66. - PubMed
-
- Bulletins—Obstetrics ACoP. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:159–167. - PubMed
-
- Clarke JF, van Rumste MM, Farquhar CM, Johnson NP, Mol BW, Herbison P. Measuring outcomes in fertility trials: can we rely on clinical pregnancy rates? Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1647–1651. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
