TERT promoter mutation status as an independent prognostic factor in cutaneous melanoma
- PMID: 25217772
- PMCID: PMC4200061
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju246
TERT promoter mutation status as an independent prognostic factor in cutaneous melanoma
Abstract
Background: Recently, TERT promoter mutations were identified at high frequencies in cutaneous melanoma tumor samples and cell lines. The mutations were found to have a UV-signature and to lead to increased TERT gene expression. We analyzed a large cohort of melanoma patients for the presence and distribution of TERT promoter mutations and their association with clinico-pathological characteristics.
Methods: 410 melanoma tumor samples were analyzed by Sanger sequencing for the presence of TERT promoter mutations. An analysis of associations between mutation status and various clinical and pathologic variables was performed.
Results: TERT promoter mutations were identified in 154 (43%) of 362 successfully sequenced melanomas. Mutation frequencies varied between melanoma subtype, being most frequent in melanomas arising in nonacral skin (48%) and melanomas with occult primary (50%), and less frequent in mucosal (23%), and acral (19%) melanomas. Mutations carried a UV signature (C>T or CC>TT). The presence of TERT promoter mutations was associated with factors such as BRAF or NRAS mutation (P < .001), histologic type (P = .002), and Breslow thickness (P < .001). TERT promoter mutation was independently associated with poorer overall survival in patients with nonacral cutaneous melanomas (median survival 80 months vs 291 months for wild-type; hazard ratio corrected for other covariates 2.47; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.29 to 4.74; P = .006).
Conclusions: UV-induced TERT promoter mutations are one of the most frequent genetic alterations in melanoma, with frequencies varying depending on melanoma subtype. In nonacral cutaneous melanomas, presence of TERT promoter mutations is independently associated with poor prognosis.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures


Comment in
-
RE: TERT promoter mutation status as an independent prognostic factor in cutaneous melanoma.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Mar 9;107(4):djv049. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv049. Print 2015 Apr. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015. PMID: 25755155 No abstract available.
-
Response.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Mar 9;107(4):djv051. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv051. Print 2015 Apr. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015. PMID: 25755156 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of SDHD promoter mutations in various types of melanoma.Oncotarget. 2015 Sep 22;6(28):25868-82. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4665. Oncotarget. 2015. PMID: 26327518 Free PMC article.
-
TERT promoter mutation is uncommon in acral lentiginous melanoma.J Cutan Pathol. 2014 Jun;41(6):504-8. doi: 10.1111/cup.12323. Epub 2014 Apr 2. J Cutan Pathol. 2014. PMID: 24588324
-
Melanomas of unknown primary frequently harbor TERT-promoter mutations.Melanoma Res. 2014 Apr;24(2):131-6. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000048. Melanoma Res. 2014. PMID: 24463461
-
TERT and TERT promoter in melanocytic neoplasms: Current concepts in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognosis.J Cutan Pathol. 2020 Aug;47(8):710-719. doi: 10.1111/cup.13691. Epub 2020 Apr 3. J Cutan Pathol. 2020. PMID: 32202662 Review.
-
Germline MC1R variants and frequency of somatic BRAF, NRAS, and TERT mutations in melanoma: Literature review and meta-analysis.Mol Carcinog. 2021 Mar;60(3):167-171. doi: 10.1002/mc.23280. Epub 2021 Jan 14. Mol Carcinog. 2021. PMID: 33444485 Review.
Cited by
-
Panel sequencing melanomas.J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Feb;135(2):335-336. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.420. J Invest Dermatol. 2015. PMID: 25573045
-
Coexistence of TERT promoter and BRAF mutations in cutaneous melanoma is associated with more clinicopathological features of aggressiveness.Virchows Arch. 2015 Aug;467(2):177-84. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1784-x. Epub 2015 Jun 9. Virchows Arch. 2015. PMID: 26055532
-
Association of TERT promoter mutation 1,295,228 C>T with BRAF V600E mutation, older patient age, and distant metastasis in anaplastic thyroid cancer.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Apr;100(4):E632-7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-3606. Epub 2015 Jan 13. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015. PMID: 25584719 Free PMC article.
-
Telomerase reactivation induces progression of mouse Braf V600E -driven thyroid cancers without telomere lengthening.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Jan 24:2023.01.24.525280. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.24.525280. bioRxiv. 2023. Update in: Mol Cancer Res. 2023 Nov 1;21(11):1163-1175. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-23-0144. PMID: 36747657 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Longer genotypically-estimated leukocyte telomere length is associated with increased meningioma risk.J Neurooncol. 2019 May;142(3):479-487. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03119-w. Epub 2019 Feb 22. J Neurooncol. 2019. PMID: 30796745 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002;417(6892):949–954 - PubMed
-
- Albino AP, Le Strange R, Oliff AI, et al. Transforming ras genes from human melanoma: a manifestation of tumour heterogeneity? Nature. 1984;308(5954):69–72 - PubMed
-
- Curtin JA, Busam K, Pinkel D, et al. Somatic activation of KIT in distinct subtypes of melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(26):4340–4346 - PubMed
-
- Curtin JA, Fridlyand J, Kageshita T, et al. Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(20):2135–2147 - PubMed
-
- Guldberg P, thor Straten P, Birck A, et al. Disruption of the MMAC1/PTEN gene by deletion or mutation is a frequent event in malignant melanoma. Cancer Res. 1997;57(17):3660–3663 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous