Three-year hemodynamic performance, left ventricular mass regression, and prosthetic-patient mismatch after rapid deployment aortic valve replacement in 287 patients
- PMID: 25218544
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.049
Three-year hemodynamic performance, left ventricular mass regression, and prosthetic-patient mismatch after rapid deployment aortic valve replacement in 287 patients
Abstract
Objective: Superior aortic valve hemodynamic performance can accelerate left ventricular mass regression and enhance survival and functional status after surgical aortic valve replacement. This can be achieved by rapid deployment aortic valve replacement using a subannular balloon-expandable stent frame, which functionally widens and reshapes the left ventricular outflow tract, to ensure a larger effective orifice area compared with conventional surgical valves. We report the intermediate-term follow-up data from a large series of patients enrolled in the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial.
Methods: In a prospective, multicenter (6 European hospitals), single-arm study, 287 patients with aortic stenosis underwent rapid deployment aortic valve replacement using a stented trileaflet bovine pericardial bioprosthesis. Core laboratory echocardiography was performed at baseline, discharge, and 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years after rapid deployment aortic valve replacement.
Results: The mean patient age was 75.7 ± 6.7 years (range, 45-93; 49.1% women). The mean aortic valve gradient significantly decreased from discharge to 3 years of follow-up. The mean effective orifice area remained stable from discharge to 3 years. At 1 year, the left ventricular mass index had decreased by 14% (P < .0001) and at 3 years by 16% (P < .0001) compared with at discharge. The prevalence of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch was 3% at discharge and remained stable during the follow-up period.
Conclusions: In a large series of elderly patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, rapid deployment aortic valve replacement using a subannular balloon-expandable stent frame demonstrated excellent hemodynamic performance and significant left ventricular mass regression. With continued follow-up, future studies will establish whether these favorable structural changes correlate with improvement in long-term survival and functional status.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01445171.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Discussion.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;148(6):2860-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.058. Epub 2014 Sep 11. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014. PMID: 25218535 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Jan;145(1):110-5; discussion 115-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.108. Epub 2012 Oct 8. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23058665 Clinical Trial.
-
Patient-prosthesis mismatch and left ventricular remodelling after implantation of Shelhigh SuperStentless aortic valve prostheses.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2008 Aug;49(4):539-43. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2008. PMID: 18665119
-
Left ventricular mass regression after sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis: preliminary results.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;18(1):38-42. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt362. Epub 2013 Oct 8. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24105865 Free PMC article.
-
Biological aortic valve replacement: advantages and optimal indications of stentless compared to stented valve substitutes. A review.Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 May;66(5):247-256. doi: 10.1007/s11748-018-0884-3. Epub 2018 Jan 10. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29322433 Review.
-
Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annulus.Circulation. 2019 Jun 4;139(23):2685-2702. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038408. Epub 2019 Jun 3. Circulation. 2019. PMID: 31157994 Review.
Cited by
-
Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement International Registry (SU-AVR-IR): design and rationale from the International Valvular Surgery Study Group (IVSSG).Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Mar;4(2):131-9. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.02.05. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015. PMID: 25870808 Free PMC article.
-
Intermediate-term outcome of 500 consecutive rapid-deployment surgical aortic valve procedures†.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Mar 1;55(3):527-533. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy273. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019. PMID: 30137264 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid deployment versus its conventional counterpart in aortic valve replacement: comparison of early hemodynamic outcomes.J Thorac Dis. 2023 Jul 31;15(7):3673-3684. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-318. Epub 2023 Jun 30. J Thorac Dis. 2023. PMID: 37559609 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid Deployment Aortic Valves Deliver Superior Hemodynamic Performance In Vitro.Innovations (Phila). 2017 Sep/Oct;12(5):338-345. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000407. Innovations (Phila). 2017. PMID: 29023351 Free PMC article.
-
Reverse remodelling after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Jun 28;33(1):10-18. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab046. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 33615334 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical