Intravaginal misoprostol alone versus intravaginal misoprostol and extraamniotic Foley catheter for second trimester pregnancy termination: an observational study
- PMID: 25219136
- DOI: 10.17772/gp/1774
Intravaginal misoprostol alone versus intravaginal misoprostol and extraamniotic Foley catheter for second trimester pregnancy termination: an observational study
Abstract
Background: No systematic empirical research exists addressing the question of optimal pregnancy termination method in second trimester pregnancies.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol and extraamniotic Foley catheter combination for second trimester pregnancy termination.
Methods: A single center observational study was conducted in a total of 91 pregnancies. Women who met the termination of pregnancy criteria due to feto-maternal indications between 13 to 26 gestational weeks were included into the study. Study participants received intravaginal misoprostol in combination with Foley catheter (n = 46) or intravaginal misoprostol alone (n = 45).
Results: The efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter insertion combination was comparable to that of intravaginal misoprostol alone in terms of time to abortion/birth [median (95% Confidential Interval [95% CI]): 14.33 (11.33-17.25) hours and 12.08 (9.50-15.33) hours, respectively Hazard Ratio: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.12, p = 0.14 (log-rank)]. The only serious maternal event was uterine rupture observed in one woman in Foley combination group.
Conclusion: The combination of intravaginal misoprostol and extraamniotic Foley catheter for second trimester pregnancy termination does not provide additional efficacy.
Similar articles
-
Second trimester pregnancy termination including fetal death: comparison of five different methods.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996 Nov;69(2):97-102. doi: 10.1016/0301-2115(95)02548-0. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996. PMID: 8902440 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter alone or in combination for termination of second trimester pregnancy.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Jan;28(1):93-6. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.905909. Epub 2014 Apr 9. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015. Retraction in: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2025 Dec;38(1):2535602. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2025.2535602. PMID: 24635496 Retracted. Clinical Trial.
-
Low-dose vaginal misoprostol with or without Foley catheter for late second-trimester pregnancy termination in women with previous multiple cesarean sections.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Nov;32(22):3703-3707. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1470236. Epub 2018 May 9. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019. PMID: 29742942 Clinical Trial.
-
Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 11;17(6):1825. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061825. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32168947 Free PMC article.
-
[Misoprostol in case of termination of pregnancy in the second and third trimesters. Trials].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2014 Feb;43(2):162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.11.009. Epub 2014 Jan 16. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2014. PMID: 24440001 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Intra uterine extra-amniotic versus vaginal misoprostol for termination of second trimester miscarriage: A randomized controlled trial.Int J Reprod Biomed. 2016 Oct;14(10):643-648. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2016. PMID: 27921088 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of second-trimester termination procedure; medical, mechanic, or combine?Interv Med Appl Sci. 2018 Sep;10(3):133-136. doi: 10.1556/1646.10.2018.25. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2018. PMID: 30713751 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous