A mega recognition memory study of 2897 disyllabic words
- PMID: 25220011
- DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.945096
A mega recognition memory study of 2897 disyllabic words
Abstract
Following the studies by Cortese, Khanna, and Hacker (2010) on recognition memory for monosyllabic words, recognition memory estimates (e.g., hits, false alarms, hits minus false alarms) for 3000 disyllabic words were obtained from 120 subjects and 2897 of these words were analysed via multiple regression. Participants studied 30 lists of 50 words and were tested on 30 lists of 100 words. Of the subjects, 60 received a constant study time of 2000 ms per item and 60 studied items at their own pace. Specific predictor variables included log word frequency, word length, imageability, age of acquisition, orthographic similarity, and phonological similarity. The results were similar to those of Cortese et al. (2010). Specifically, in the analysis of hits minus false alarms, the entire set of predictor variables accounted for 34.9% of the variance. All predictor variables except phonological similarity were related to performance, with imageability, length, orthographic similarity and frequency all being strong predictors. These results are mostly compatible with the predictions made by single- and dual-process theories. However, across items hit rates were not correlated with false alarms. Given that most variables produced the standard mirror pattern, this latter outcome poses a major challenge for recognition memory theories.
Keywords: Megastudy; Recognition memory.
Similar articles
-
Recognition memory for 2,578 monosyllabic words.Memory. 2010 Aug;18(6):595-609. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2010.493892. Epub 2010 Jul 30. Memory. 2010. PMID: 20677075
-
Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):946-72. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.722660. Epub 2012 Oct 2. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013. PMID: 23030642
-
Dissociative contributions of semantic and lexical-phonological information to immediate recognition.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Mar;39(2):642-8. doi: 10.1037/a0029160. Epub 2012 Jul 9. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013. PMID: 22774851
-
Is reading-aloud performance in megastudies systematically influenced by the list context?Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1711-22. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.974624. Epub 2014 Nov 18. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015. PMID: 25312702
-
The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of Chinese characters: A megastudy analysis.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1541-70. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.985234. Epub 2015 Jan 27. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015. PMID: 25622522
Cited by
-
BRAND: Brand recognition and attitude norms database.Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 16;57(1):17. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02525-x. Behav Res Methods. 2024. PMID: 39681772 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of lexical skills and orthographic neighborhood size in word memory.Mem Cognit. 2024 Apr;52(3):610-621. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01487-3. Epub 2023 Nov 9. Mem Cognit. 2024. PMID: 37943413 Free PMC article.
-
Noun imageability and the processing of sensory-based information.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Oct;77(10):2137-2150. doi: 10.1177/17470218231216304. Epub 2023 Dec 21. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024. PMID: 37953293 Free PMC article.
-
Less imageable words lead to more looks to blank locations during memory retrieval.Psychol Res. 2020 Apr;84(3):667-684. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1084-6. Epub 2018 Sep 1. Psychol Res. 2020. PMID: 30173279 Free PMC article.
-
Inference About Absence as a Window Into the Mental Self-Model.Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Apr 22;9:635-651. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00206. eCollection 2025. Open Mind (Camb). 2025. PMID: 40337358 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources