Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Aug 29:5:304.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00304. eCollection 2014.

Drosophila comet assay: insights, uses, and future perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Drosophila comet assay: insights, uses, and future perspectives

Isabel Gaivão et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

The comet assay, a very useful tool in genotoxicity and DNA repair testing, is being applied to Drosophila melanogaster since around 15 years ago, by several research groups. This organism is a valuable model for all kind of processes related to human health, including DNA damage response. The assay has been performed mainly in vivo using different larvae cell types (from brain, midgut, hemolymph, and imaginal disk), but also in vitro with the S2 cell line. Since its first application, it has been used to analyze the genotoxicity and action mechanisms of different chemicals, demonstrating good sensitivity and proving its usefulness. Moreover, it is the only assay that can be used to analyze DNA repair in somatic cells in vivo, comparing the effects of chemicals in different repair strains, and to quantitate repair activities in vitro. Additionally, the comet assay in Drosophila, in vivo and in vitro, has been applied to study the influence of protein overexpression on genome integrity and degradation. Although the assay is well established, it could benefit from some research to determine optimal experimental design to standardize it, and then to allow comparisons among laboratories independently of the chosen cell type.

Keywords: DNA repair; Drosophila; comet assay; genotoxicity; hemocytes; midgut cells; neuroblast cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Azqueta A., Collins A. R. (2013). The essential comet assay: a comprehensive guide to measuring DNA damage and repair. Arch. Toxicol. 87 949–968 10.1007/s00204-013-1070-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azqueta A., Gutzkow K. B., Brunborg G., Collins A. R. (2011). Towards a more reliable comet assay; Optimising agarose concentration, unwinding time and electrophoresis conditions. Mutat. Res. 724 41–45 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.05.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bilbao C., Ferreiro J. A., Comendador M. A., Sierra L. M. (2002). Influence of mus201 and mus308 mutations of Drosophila melanogaster on the genotoxicity of model chemicals in somatic cells in vivo measured with the comet assay. Mutat. Res. 503 11–19 10.1016/S0027-5107(02)00070-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brennan L. J., Haukedal J. A., Earle J. C., Keddie B., Harris H. L. (2012). Disruption of redox homeostasis leads to oxidative DNA damage in spermatocytes of Wolbachia-infected Drosophila simulans. Insect Mol. Biol. 21 510–520 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2012.01155.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burlinson B., Tice R. R., Speit G., Agurell E., Brendler-Schwaab S. Y., Collins A. R., et al. (2007) In vivo comet assay workgroup, part of the fourth international workgroup on genotoxicity testing: results of the in vivo comet assay workgroup. Mutat. Res. 627:31–35 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.08.011 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources