Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Dec;35(12):1204-11.
doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000198.

Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic lymph-node metastases in patients with early-stage uterine cervical cancer: comparison with MRI findings

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic lymph-node metastases in patients with early-stage uterine cervical cancer: comparison with MRI findings

Kuan Lv et al. Nucl Med Commun. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the applied value of F-fluoro-2-dexoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) and MRI in detecting lymph-node metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer.

Materials and methods: A retrospective study was performed on 87 early-stage cervical cancer patients evaluated with PET/CT and pelvic MRI before surgery. Histopathological evaluation of lymph nodes served as the diagnostic standard. F-FDG PET/CT and MRI images were analyzed and correlated with histopathological findings.

Results: The overall node-based sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of PET/CT were 91% (61/67), 78.2% (61/78), 99.4% (1079/1085), and 98% (1140/1163), respectively, which were higher than the corresponding values of MRI, at 37.3% (25/67), 61% (25/41), 96.3% (1080/1122), and 95% (1105/1163) (P<0.034). The difference in diagnostic efficacy for identifying node-based metastases between PET/CT and MRI was significant (PET/CT vs. MRI, 0.719 vs. 0.587, P=0.017). Meanwhile, the overall patient-based sensitivity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of PET/CT were 100% (34/34), 87.2% (34/39), 100% (48/48), and 94.3% (82/87), respectively, whereas the corresponding MRI values were 44% (15/34), 65% (15/23),74% (45/61), and 69% (60/87) (P<0.04). The difference in diagnostic efficacy for identifying patient-based metastases between PET/CT and MRI was significant (PET/CT vs. MRI, 0.974 vs. 0.705, P<0.001).

Conclusion: PET/CT has been proven to be valuable in detecting lymph-node metastases. Compared with MRI, PET/CT has higher sensitivity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer for detecting lymphatic metastases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances