Narrative reviews
- PMID: 25223334
- PMCID: PMC4207097
- DOI: 10.4178/epih/e2014018
Narrative reviews
Abstract
Although qualitative researches (QR) are invaluable in understanding complex healthcare situations, the quantitative systematic reviews could not treat them. To improve quality of healthcare services, results of QR should be considered in healthcare decision-making processes. Several methods and theories for synthesizing evidences of QR have been developed. In order to activate the narrative reviews and mixed methods reviews in Korean healthcare academies, I arranged the related nomenclatures and suggested some issues to conduct them.
Keywords: Evidence-based practice; Meta-analysis as topic; Qualitative evaluation; Qualitative research; Review literature as topic.
Conflict of interest statement
The author has no conflicts of interest to declare for this study
References
-
- Miles A, Bentley P, Polychronis A, Grey J. Evidence-based medicine: why all the fuss? This is why. J Eval Clin Pract. 1997;3:83–86. - PubMed
-
- Miles A, Bentley P, Polychronis A, Grey J, Price N. Recent progress in health services research: on the need for evidence-based debate. J Eval Clin Pract. 1998;4:257–265. - PubMed
-
- Miles A, Bentley P, Polychronis A, Grey J, Price N. Advancing the evidence-based healthcare debate. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999;5:97–101. - PubMed
-
- King S, Forbes K, Hanks GW, Ferro CJ, Chambers EJ. A systematic review of the use of opioid medication for those with moderate to severe cancer pain and renal impairment: a European Palliative Care Research Collaborative opioid guidelines project. Palliat Med. 2011;25:525–552. - PubMed
-
- Fox DM. Evidence of evidence-based health policy: the politics of systematic reviews in coverage decisions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24:114–122. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources