Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;12(2):224-31.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.12372. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

Assessment and documentation of non-healing, chronic wounds in inpatient health care facilities in the Czech Republic: an evaluation study

Affiliations

Assessment and documentation of non-healing, chronic wounds in inpatient health care facilities in the Czech Republic: an evaluation study

Andrea Pokorná et al. Int Wound J. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

The foundation of health care management of patients with non-healing, chronic wounds needs accurate evaluation followed by the selection of an appropriate therapeutic strategy. Assessment of non-healing, chronic wounds in clinical practice in the Czech Republic is not standardised. The aim of this study was to analyse the methods being used to assess non-healing, chronic wounds in inpatient facilities in the Czech Republic. The research was carried out at 77 inpatient medical facilities (8 university/faculty hospitals, 63 hospitals and 6 long- term hospitals) across all regions of the Czech Republic. A mixed model was used for the research (participatory observation including creation of field notes and content analysis of documents for documentation and analysis of qualitative and quantitative data). The results of this research have corroborated the suspicion of inconsistencies in procedures used by general nurses for assessment of non-healing, chronic wounds. However, the situation was found to be more positive with regard to evaluation of basic/fundamental parameters of a wound (e.g. size, depth and location of a wound) compared with the evaluation of more specific parameters (e.g. exudate or signs of infection). This included not only the number of observed variables, but also the action taken. Both were significantly improved when a consultant for wound healing was present (P = 0·047). The same applied to facilities possessing a certificate of quality issued by the Czech Wound Management Association (P = 0·010). In conclusion, an effective strategy for wound management depends on the method and scope of the assessment of non-healing, chronic wounds in place in clinical practice in observed facilities; improvement may be expected following the general introduction of a 'non-healing, chronic wound assessment' algorithm.

Keywords: Chronic wounds; Clinical guidelines; Nursing practice; Wound assessment; Wound management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Wound management organisation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Basic/fundamental wound parameters – objectification.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Specific wound parameters – objectification.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Assessment according to the type of unit.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Assessment according to the presence of wound consultant.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bates‐Jenson BM, Sussman C. Wound care: a collaborative practice manual for physical therapists and nurses. Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers, 2001.
    1. Russell L. The importance of wound documentation and classification. In: White R, editor. Trends in wound care. Bath: Mark Allen Publishing, 2002. - PubMed
    1. Ousey K, Cook L. Understanding the importance of holistic wound assessment. Pract Nurs 2011;22:308–14.
    1. Bradbury S, Ivins N, Harding K. Case series evaluation of a silver non‐adherent dressing. Wounds UK 2011;7:12–9.
    1. Lafferty B, Wood L, Davis P. Improved care and reduced costs with advanced wound dressings. Wounds UK 2011;7:14–23.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources