The Science of Science Communication II

Affiliations

¹ Departments of Engineering and Public Policy and Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; and baruch@cmu.edu scheufele@wisc.edu.
² Department of Life Sciences Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706 baruch@cmu.edu scheufele@wisc.edu.

Baruch Fischhoff et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014.

. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13583-4.

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414635111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.

¹ Departments of Engineering and Public Policy and Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; and baruch@cmu.edu scheufele@wisc.edu.
² Department of Life Sciences Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706 baruch@cmu.edu scheufele@wisc.edu.

No abstract available

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

1. Bush V. Science the Endless Frontier. Washington: US Government Printing Office; 1945.
1. Scheufele DA. Science communication as political communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:13585–13592. - PMC - PubMed
1. Fiske ST, Dupree C. Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:13593–13597. - PMC - PubMed
1. Hall Jamieson K, Hardy BW. Leveraging scientific credibility about Arctic sea ice trends in a polarized political environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:13598–13605. - PMC - PubMed
1. Pidgeon N, Demski C, Butler C, Parkhill K, Spence A. Creating a national citizen engagement process for energy policy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:13606–13613. - PMC - PubMed