Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;11(4):481-8.

Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A clinical trial

Affiliations

Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A clinical trial

Ankur Kansal et al. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Low-intensity laser therapy (LILT) can be utilized for different treatments in the field of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of LILT on (1) the rate of canine movement during canine retraction phase and (2) evaluate the radiographic changes occurring during LILT around the irradiated area.

Materials and methods: A total of 10 patients of both genders were included for this study. One quadrant of the upper arch was considered control group (CG) and received mechanical activation of the canine teeth with 150 g. The opposite quadrant received the same mechanical activation and was also irradiated with a diode emitting light (gallium-arsenide laser) at 904 nm, for 10 s at 12 mW, at 4.2 J/cm(2). Laser application was done on 1(st) day, 3(rd), 7(th), 14(th), 21(th), 28(th), 35(th), 42(nd), 49(th), 56(th) day respectively during the canine retraction phase. Distance was measured on 1(st) day, 35(th) day and 63(rd) day and appliance activation was done on 1(st) and 35(th) day. Results were analyzed using t-test with the significance level set at P < 0.01.

Results: Mean value obtained from 1(st) to 63(rd) day was 3.30 ± 2.36 mm for CG and 3.53 ± 2.30 mm for laser group (LG).

Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction between the LG and the CG. There was no evidence of any pathologic changes in the radiograph following LILT.

Keywords: Bone remodeling; canine retraction; gallium-arsenide diode laser; orthodontic tooth movement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stress and tension gauge
Figure 2
Figure 2
Gallium-arsenide laser
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of laser irradiation doses
Figure 4
Figure 4
Digital electronic caliper
Figure 5
Figure 5
Quadrant wise distribution of groups
Figure 6
Figure 6
Summary according to treatment groups
Figure 7
Figure 7
Comparison of control and laser group with respect to the rate of orthodontic tooth movement

References

    1. Cruz DR, Kohara EK, Ribeiro MS, Wetter NU. Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the orthodontic movement velocity of human teeth: A preliminary study. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;35:117–20. - PubMed
    1. Limpanichkul W, Godfrey K, Srisuk N, Rattanayatikul C. Effects of low-level laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2006;9:38–43. - PubMed
    1. Yamasaki K, Miura F, Suda T. Prostaglandin as a mediator of bone resorption induced by experimental tooth movement in rats. J Dent Res. 1980;59:1635–42. - PubMed
    1. Yamasaki K, Shibata Y, Imai S, Tani Y, Shibasaki Y, Fukuhara T. Clinical application of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) upon orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:508–18. - PubMed
    1. Valiathan A, Dhar S. Prostaglandins and enhanced orthodontic tooth movement: In search of the silver bullet. Curr Sci. 2006;90:311–3.

LinkOut - more resources