Reader reaction to "a robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes" by Zhang et al. (2012)
- PMID: 25228049
- PMCID: PMC4768908
- DOI: 10.1111/biom.12228
Reader reaction to "a robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes" by Zhang et al. (2012)
Abstract
A recent article (Zhang et al., 2012, Biometrics 168, 1010-1018) compares regression based and inverse probability based methods of estimating an optimal treatment regime and shows for a small number of covariates that inverse probability weighted methods are more robust to model misspecification than regression methods. We demonstrate that using models that fit the data better reduces the concern about non-robustness for the regression methods. We extend the simulation study of Zhang et al. (2012, Biometrics 168, 1010-1018), also considering the situation of a larger number of covariates, and show that incorporating random forests into both regression and inverse probability weighted based methods improves their properties.
Keywords: Optimal treatment regime; Random forests.
© 2014, The International Biometric Society.
Comment in
-
Response to reader reaction.Biometrics. 2015 Mar;71(1):267-273. doi: 10.1111/biom.12229. Epub 2014 Oct 29. Biometrics. 2015. PMID: 25355405 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes.Biometrics. 2012 Dec;68(4):1010-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01763.x. Epub 2012 May 2. Biometrics. 2012. PMID: 22550953 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical