Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 17;4(9):e006145.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006145.

A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol

Affiliations

A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol

Eva-Maria Berens et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women. In Germany, women are invited to a population-based mammography screening programme for the first time at the age of 50. Since it is still discussed whether the benefits of mammography screening outweigh its harms, the concept of informed choice has gained importance. The objective of this cross-sectional study is to assess the proportion of informed choices in the mammography screening programme. A special focus is on the examination of the impact of Turkish migration background and educational level on informed choices.

Methods and analysis: The proportion of informed choices is evaluated in a cross-sectional study with 3-month follow-up for behavioural implementation of the screening intention. A randomly selected sample of 17,000 women aged 50 years living in Westphalia-Lippe, a region in the Federal State of North-Rhine Westphalia, is invited to participate in this study. To reach adequate numbers of Turkish women, all possibly Turkish women in the sample are identified through a name algorithm and contacted. The sample is drawn from women registered in the study area for which the registration offices consented to supply data for the study (88% of all towns/cities in the study region). Women identified through the Turkish name algorithm received all materials in German and Turkish. The primary outcome is informed choice. Data are collected on informed choice components (knowledge, attitude, decision/implementation) as well as on its possible determinants (eg, health behaviour, perceived behavioural control, subjective norms, invitation status, migration background and other demographic variables). Data are collected before the screening appointment and at 3 months follow-up.

Ethics and dissemination: The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Medical Faculty of Muenster University. Results will be published in a relevant scientific journal and communicated to respondents and relevant institutions.

Keywords: informed choice; mammography screening; migrants; participation; social determinants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Timeline of mammography invitation and study procedure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. von Karsa L, Anttila A, Ronco G, et al. Cancer screening in the European Union: Report on the implementation of the Council Recommendation on cancer screening International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2008. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_determinants/genetics/documents/cancer_scr... (accessed 17 Jul 2014)
    1. Robert Koch-Institut und die Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e.V. Krebs in Deutschland 2009/2010, 9th edn. Berlin, 2013
    1. Kooperationsgemeinschaft Mammographie. Evaluationsbericht 2005–2007—Ergebnisse des Mammographie-Screening-Programms in Deutschland, 2009. http://www.mammo-programm.de/cms_upload/datenpool/evaluationsbericht05–0... (accessed 8 Feb 2013)
    1. Kooperationsgemeinschaft Mammographie. Evaluationsbericht 2008–2009—Ergebnisse des Mammographie-Screening-Programms in Deutschland, 2012. http://www.mammo-programm.de/cms_upload/datenpool/evaluationsbericht_200... (accessed 8 Feb 2013)
    1. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. 4th edn Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2006

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources