Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec;52(12):4168-71.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.02178-14. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

A single-tube multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae clinical specimens by use of multiplex PCR-capillary electrophoresis

Affiliations

A single-tube multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae clinical specimens by use of multiplex PCR-capillary electrophoresis

Chao Yan et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

In this study, we developed a single-tube multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat (VNTR) analysis (MLVA) assay to type Mycoplasma pneumoniae directly from respiratory samples collected from children with respiratory infections. The multiplex PCR included four fluorescently primed VNTRs (Mpn13, Mpn14, Mpn15, and Mpn16) and was carried out in a single tube. A total of 137 M. pneumoniae-positive specimens, collected in 2013 from Beijing, China, were divided among four types (M4-5-7-2, M4-5-6-2, M3-5-6-2, and M5-5-7-2) using the amended MLVA system. The most prevalent genotype was M4-5-7-2. No correlation was found between macrolide resistance in the M. pneumoniae samples and the MLVA types. To our knowledge, this is the first study to type and analyze M. pneumoniae clinical specimens using multiplex PCR-capillary electrophoresis in a single tube. This novel low-cost method can be used to rapidly type M. pneumoniae clinical specimens directly and shows great potential for monitoring outbreaks of M. pneumoniae.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Waites KB, Talkington DF. 2004. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and its role as a human pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17:697–728. 10.1128/CMR.17.4.697-728.2004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lenglet A, Herrador Z, Magiorakos AP, Leitmeyer K, Coulombier D. 2012. Surveillance status and recent data for Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in the European Union and European Economic Area. Euro Surveill. 17:20075 http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20075. - PubMed
    1. Thurman KA, Walter ND, Schwartz SB, Mitchell SL, Dillon MT, Baughman AL, Deutscher M, Fulton JP, Tongren JE, Hicks LA, Winchell JM. 2009. Comparison of laboratory diagnostic procedures for detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in community outbreaks. Clin. Infect. Dis. 48:1244–1249. 10.1086/597775. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sulyok KM, Kreizinger Z, Fekete L, Jánosi Schweitzer SN, Turcsányi I, Makrai L, Erdélyi K, Gyuranecz M. 2014. Phylogeny of Mycoplasma bovis isolates from Hungary based on multi locus sequence typing and multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis. BMC Vet. Res. 10:108. 10.1186/1746-6148-10-108. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chung S, Yi J, Jang MH, Joo SI, Ra EK, Kim SY, Chang CL, Park SS, Kim EC. 2012. Comparison of modified multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat fingerprinting with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Ann. Lab Med. 32:50–56. 10.3343/alm.2012.32.1.50. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources