Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jun;17(6):444-51.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.122. Epub 2014 Sep 18.

Solving the molecular diagnostic testing conundrum for Mendelian disorders in the era of next-generation sequencing: single-gene, gene panel, or exome/genome sequencing

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Solving the molecular diagnostic testing conundrum for Mendelian disorders in the era of next-generation sequencing: single-gene, gene panel, or exome/genome sequencing

Yuan Xue et al. Genet Med. 2015 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing is changing the paradigm of clinical genetic testing. Today there are numerous molecular tests available, including single-gene tests, gene panels, and exome sequencing or genome sequencing. As a result, ordering physicians face the conundrum of selecting the best diagnostic tool for their patients with genetic conditions. Single-gene testing is often most appropriate for conditions with distinctive clinical features and minimal locus heterogeneity. Next-generation sequencing-based gene panel testing, which can be complemented with array comparative genomic hybridization and other ancillary methods, provides a comprehensive and feasible approach for heterogeneous disorders. Exome sequencing and genome sequencing have the advantage of being unbiased regarding what set of genes is analyzed, enabling parallel interrogation of most of the genes in the human genome. However, current limitations of next-generation sequencing technology and our variant interpretation capabilities caution us against offering exome sequencing or genome sequencing as either stand-alone or first-choice diagnostic approaches. A growing interest in personalized medicine calls for the application of genome sequencing in clinical diagnostics, but major challenges must be addressed before its full potential can be realized. Here, we propose a testing algorithm to help clinicians opt for the most appropriate molecular diagnostic tool for each scenario.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Molecular diagnostic testing.
    Saul RA. Saul RA. Genet Med. 2015 Sep;17(9):761. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.115. Genet Med. 2015. PMID: 26331191 No abstract available.
  • Response to Saul.
    Xue Y, Ankala A, Wilcox WR, Hegde MR. Xue Y, et al. Genet Med. 2015 Sep;17(9):761. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.114. Genet Med. 2015. PMID: 26331192 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53083 - PubMed
    1. Hum Mutat. 2013 Jul;34(7):1035-42 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 19;108(16):6549-54 - PubMed
    1. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2011;2011:30-5 - PubMed
    1. Mol Genet Metab. 2013 Sep-Oct;110(1-2):78-85 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources