Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;54(10):989-97.
doi: 10.1007/s00117-014-2689-4.

[Gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors]

[Article in German]
C Schmid-Tannwald  1 , C M Schmid-Tannwald, M F Reiser, F Berger
Affiliations

[Gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors]

[Article in German]
C Schmid-Tannwald et al. Radiologe. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Clinical/methodical issue: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) are a rare, heterogeneous group of neoplasms. Only 2% of gastrointestinal tumors belong to the group of neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Standard radiological methods: A wide spectrum of diagnostic imaging modalities is available: apart from ultrasound not only computed tomography (CT) but also magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography CT (PET-CT) play an important role in detection and staging of GEP-NETs.

Methodical innovations: The PET-CT technique with somatostatin analogues is used for staging as well as for evaluation and monitoring of treatment with peptide radionuclide radiation therapy.

Performance: According to the literature NETs of the small bowel with a size over 3 cm can be detected with a sensitivity of 84.7% and a specificity of 96.6% using CT enteroclysis and MR enteroclysis provides the detection of NETs of the small bowel in 93.3% of cases. 'The sensitivity of MRI in detection of pancreatic NETs is between 74% and 100% and is, therefore, higher than CT. Detection of small primary tumors is carried out using PET-CT and seems to be the most sensitive imaging modality to identify the exact location. On the other hand MRI has to be regarded as the best imaging modality for detection of liver metastases compared to CT and PET-CT.

Achievements: The role of diagnostic imaging is to identify the exact location of the primary tumor and possible metastases, to define an appropriate therapy and to monitor treatment effects; however, the choice of the most appropriate diagnostic imaging modality varies depending on the location and type of the primary tumor.

Practical recommendations: The GEP-NETs are predominantly well-vascularized; therefore, dual-phase CT/MR imaging with the arterial and venous phases after contrast media injection is mandatory for detection and localization of primary tumors and metastases. For whole body staging CT and PET-CT should be performed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Radiology. 1998 Jan;206(1):143-50 - PubMed
    1. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2007;6(1):43-52 - PubMed
    1. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Dec;18(6):421-9 - PubMed
    1. Virchows Arch. 2007 Oct;451(4):757-62 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2006 Dec;241(3):796-801 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources