Overlapping frequency coverage and simulated spatial cue effects on bimodal (electrical and acoustical) sentence recognition in noise
- PMID: 25234893
- DOI: 10.1121/1.4861843
Overlapping frequency coverage and simulated spatial cue effects on bimodal (electrical and acoustical) sentence recognition in noise
Abstract
Sentence recognition in 20-talker babble was measured in eight Nucleus cochlear implant (CI) users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured both in standard configurations, with some frequency regions presented both acoustically and electrically, and in configurations with no spectral overlap. In both cases a continuous interleaved sampling strategy was used. Mean SRTs were around 3 dB better with bimodal presentation than with CI alone in overlap configurations. A spherical head model was used to simulate azimuthal separation of speech and noise and provided no evidence of a contribution of spatial cues to bimodal benefit. There was no effect on bimodal performance of whether spectral overlap was present or was eliminated by switching off electrodes assigned to frequencies below the upper limit of acoustic hearing. In a subsequent experiment the CI was acutely re-mapped so that all available electrodes were used to cover frequencies not presented acoustically. This gave increased spectral resolution via the CI as assessed by formant frequency discrimination, but no improvement in bimodal performance compared to the configuration with overlap.
Similar articles
-
Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.Hear Res. 2017 Jul;350:226-234. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 11. Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 28527538
-
A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.Hear Res. 2017 Feb;344:50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.023. Epub 2016 Nov 9. Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 27838372
-
Voice gender differences and separation of simultaneous talkers in cochlear implant users with residual hearing.J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):EL135-41. doi: 10.1121/1.4737137. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012. PMID: 22894312
-
Advantages from bilateral hearing in speech perception in noise with simulated cochlear implants and residual acoustic hearing.J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Feb;133(2):1017-30. doi: 10.1121/1.4773274. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013. PMID: 23363118
-
Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.Hear Res. 2020 May;390:107929. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107929. Epub 2020 Feb 26. Hear Res. 2020. PMID: 32182551 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Effects of Removing Low-Frequency Electric Information on Speech Perception With Bimodal Hearing.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Feb;59(1):99-109. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-15-0247. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016. PMID: 26535803 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear implant spectral bandwidth for optimizing electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS).Hear Res. 2022 Dec;426:108584. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108584. Epub 2022 Jul 28. Hear Res. 2022. PMID: 35985964 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Jan;141(1):613. doi: 10.1121/1.4974203. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017. PMID: 28147578 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous