Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Sep 18;5(1):a021170.
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a021170.

Pharmacologic considerations in use and development of antituberculosis drugs

Affiliations
Review

Pharmacologic considerations in use and development of antituberculosis drugs

Geraint Davies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. .

Abstract

Rational development and deployment of antituberculosis drugs depend on a comprehensive understanding of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics that underlie their clinical behavior. Successful implementation of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic approach faces difficulties that, although not unique to tuberculosis as a therapeutic area, in combination pose a significant scientific challenge. In recent years, a multidisciplinary response combining new technological and analytical approaches has begun to directly address many of these issues, shedding light on some previously poorly understood aspects of drug distribution and response. These advances have important implications for optimization of existing and development of novel drug regimens, putting quantitative pharmacology at the heart of preclinical and early drug development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Components of pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic models. Determinants of drug action include pharmacokinetics (systemic absorption [Ka] and elimination [Ke] of drug distribution of a biophase [Kd]) and pharmacodynamics (direct binding to or inhibition or stimulation of production [Kin] or removal [Kout] of a mediator biosignal, and transduction of the response). (Modified from Jusko et al. 1995.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Simplified scheme of a transition pharmacodynamic model for tuberculosis treatment. Boxes represent the size of subpopulations with arrows representing possible transitions between them. Each subpopulation has a defined death rate, which has been omitted for clarity, with the exception of the viable but nonculturable population at the bottom of the figure. As therapy proceeds, subpopulations are sequentially eliminated according to their characteristics.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams LB, Sinha I, Franzblau SG, Krahenbuhl JL, Mehta RT 1999. Effective treatment of acute and chronic murine tuberculosis with liposome-encapsulated clofazimine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43: 1638–1643. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beste DJV, McFadden J 2010. System-level strategies for studying the metabolism of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Biosyst 6: 2363–2372. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burhan E, Ruesen C, Ruslami R, Ginanjar A, Mangunnegoro H, Ascobat P, Donders R, van Crevel R, Aarnoutse R 2013. Isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide plasma concentrations in relation to treatment response in Indonesian pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57: 3614–3619. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canetti G 1962. The eradication of tuberculosis: Theoretical problems and practical solutions. Tubercle 43: 301–321. - PubMed
    1. Chen J, Raymond K 2006. Roles of rifampicin in drug-drug interactions: Underlying molecular mechanisms involving the nuclear pregnane X receptor. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 5: 3. - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources