Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;16(7):e16602.
doi: 10.5812/ircmj.16602. Epub 2014 Jul 5.

A pediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol for iran children hospitals

Anvar Esmaili  1 , Hesam Seyedin  2 , Obeidollah Faraji  1 , Jalal Arabloo  1 , Yaghoub Qahraman Bamdady  3 , Shahin Shojaee  3 , Saadat Hesam  3
Affiliations

A pediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol for iran children hospitals

Anvar Esmaili et al. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Applying utilization review programs is an appropriate solution to decrease the expenditure, and to increase the efficiency of healthcare systems.

Objectives: This paper presents an instrument to measure the level of appropriate admissions and days of stay (DOS) in the pediatric public hospitals of Iran.

Materials and methods: The American version of the Pediatric Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (PAEP) was modified and adjusted by our group of physicians. They carried out a retrospective study over 100 randomly selected patients. The reliability of the instrument was tested based on the consensus of reviewers using PAEP. In addition, the external validity of the instrument was studied by comparing the evaluations of the reviewers using PAEP and the individual judgments of three clinicians in two public teaching hospitals. Finally, reliability and validity were also calculated by the kappa statistic.

Results: With respect to the inter-reliability testing, there was a high level of agreement between reviewers applying the instrument in the admissions criteria and days of stay. Overall agreement was > 77%; also specific inappropriate agreement and specific appropriate agreement were > 61%, and > 72%, respectively. Regarding the validity of the testing, the instrument had a sensitivity of > 0.75, specificity of > 0.67, as well as positive and negative predictive values of > 0.93, and > 0.55, respectively. The kappa statistic for the reviewers (using the instrument for admission and days of stay criteria) were substantial (k = 0.75.5 and 0.71). They were also substantial for clinicians (k = 0.73 and 0.66).

Conclusions: These results showed that the modified PAEP is a reliable and valid instrument to study the appropriateness of admission and days of stay in Iran hospitals. As the developing countries, particularly, Middle East countries have the same status and culture, the result of this study (with minor changes) could be applied in these countries too.

Keywords: Hospital; Iran; Reliability; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tabibzadeh M. An Evaluation on the Health System Progress and Economic Development Indicators in Iran. Online Int In Res J. 2013;3(4):182–92.
    1. Mehrara M, Fazaeli A. A Study on Health Expenditures in Relation with Economics Growth in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Countries. J Health Admin. 2009;12(35):49–60.
    1. Statistical Center of Iran . [Annual Report, 2002 to 2007]. Iran: Iran National Health Accounts; 2011.
    1. Esmail A. Development of the Paediatric Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol for use in the United Kingdom. J Public Health Med. 2000;22(2):224–30. - PubMed
    1. Zaboli R, Seyedin S, Khosravi SST. Effect of per-case reimbursement on performance indicators of a military hospital's wards. Mil Med J. 2011;13(3):155–8.

LinkOut - more resources