Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 20:14:196.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-196.

"Concerns" about medical students' adverse behaviour and attitude: an audit of practice at Nottingham, with mapping to GMC guidance

Affiliations

"Concerns" about medical students' adverse behaviour and attitude: an audit of practice at Nottingham, with mapping to GMC guidance

Janet Yates. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: The development and maintenance of students' professional behaviour and attitude is of increasing importance in medical education. Unprofessional behaviour in doctors has the potential to jeopardise patient safety, compromise working relationships, and cause disruption and distress. The General Medical Council issues guidance to medical schools and students describing the standards that should be attained.Nottingham University medical school introduced a 'Concerns' form in 2009, to create a standardised, transparent and defensible means of recording and handling complaints about adverse attitudes or behaviours. This paper reports an audit of the system over the first three years.

Methods: The routinely-held database was enhanced with further detail collected from relevant student records. The data were explored in terms of the types of complaint, students who were reported, the people who reported them, and the actions taken afterwards. The data were also mapped to the current GMC guidance.

Results: 189 valid forms were generated, relating to 143 students. The form was used by a wide variety of people, including clinical and non-clinical teachers, administrators, Hall Wardens, and fellow students. The concerns ranged from infringements of regulations to serious fitness to practise issues. Most were dealt with by faculty or pastoral care staff but some required escalation to formal hearings. The complaints were mapped successfully to GMC documentation, with the highest proportions relating to the GMC categories 'Good Clinical Care' and 'Working with Colleagues'.Male and ethnic minority students appeared to be more likely to have a Concern raised, but this is a tentative conclusion that requires a larger sample. Undergraduate (as opposed to Graduate Entry) students may also be at greater risk.

Conclusions: A simple form, freely available, but designed to prevent frivolous or malicious use, has provided valuable data on unprofessional behaviour and the responses elicited. Some parts of the form require improvements, and these are underway to provide more efficient use, audit and review in future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mapping of categories of Concerns to areas of GMC professional values & fitness to practise.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of mapping points against GMC categories of professional behaviour.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Papadakis M, Hodgson C, Teherani A, Kohatsu N. Unprofessional behavior in medical school is associated with subsequent disciplinary action by a State Medical Board. Acad Med. 2004;79:244–249. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200403000-00011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Papadakis M, Teherani A, Banach M, Knettler T, Rattner S, Stern D, Veloski J, Hodgson C. Disciplinary action by Medical Boards and prior behaviour in medical school. New Engl J Med. 2005;353:2673–2682. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa052596. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Teherani A, O’Sullivan P, Lovett M, Hauer K. Categorization of unprofessional behaviours identified during administration of and remediation after a comprehensive clinical performance examination using a validated professionalism framework. Med Teach. 2009;31:1007–1012. doi: 10.3109/01421590802642537. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parker M, Turner J, McGurgan P, Emmerton L, McAllister L, Wilkinson D. The difficult problem: assessing medical students’ professional attitudes and behaviour. Med J Austr. 2010;11/12:662–664. - PubMed
    1. van Mook W, Gorter S, de Grave W, van Luijk S, Wass V, Zwaveling J, Schuwirth L, van der Vleuten C. Bad apples spoil the barrel: addressing unprofessional behaviour. Med Teach. 2010;32:891–898. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.497823. - DOI - PubMed
Pre-publication history
    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/14/196/prepub

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources