"Concerns" about medical students' adverse behaviour and attitude: an audit of practice at Nottingham, with mapping to GMC guidance
- PMID: 25239087
- PMCID: PMC4189166
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-196
"Concerns" about medical students' adverse behaviour and attitude: an audit of practice at Nottingham, with mapping to GMC guidance
Abstract
Background: The development and maintenance of students' professional behaviour and attitude is of increasing importance in medical education. Unprofessional behaviour in doctors has the potential to jeopardise patient safety, compromise working relationships, and cause disruption and distress. The General Medical Council issues guidance to medical schools and students describing the standards that should be attained.Nottingham University medical school introduced a 'Concerns' form in 2009, to create a standardised, transparent and defensible means of recording and handling complaints about adverse attitudes or behaviours. This paper reports an audit of the system over the first three years.
Methods: The routinely-held database was enhanced with further detail collected from relevant student records. The data were explored in terms of the types of complaint, students who were reported, the people who reported them, and the actions taken afterwards. The data were also mapped to the current GMC guidance.
Results: 189 valid forms were generated, relating to 143 students. The form was used by a wide variety of people, including clinical and non-clinical teachers, administrators, Hall Wardens, and fellow students. The concerns ranged from infringements of regulations to serious fitness to practise issues. Most were dealt with by faculty or pastoral care staff but some required escalation to formal hearings. The complaints were mapped successfully to GMC documentation, with the highest proportions relating to the GMC categories 'Good Clinical Care' and 'Working with Colleagues'.Male and ethnic minority students appeared to be more likely to have a Concern raised, but this is a tentative conclusion that requires a larger sample. Undergraduate (as opposed to Graduate Entry) students may also be at greater risk.
Conclusions: A simple form, freely available, but designed to prevent frivolous or malicious use, has provided valuable data on unprofessional behaviour and the responses elicited. Some parts of the form require improvements, and these are underway to provide more efficient use, audit and review in future.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Medical student rankings of proposed sanction for unprofessional behaviours relating to academic integrity: results from a Scottish medical school.Scott Med J. 2012 May;57(2):76-9. doi: 10.1258/smj.2012.012003. Scott Med J. 2012. PMID: 22555226
-
Risk factors at medical school for subsequent professional misconduct: multicentre retrospective case-control study.BMJ. 2010 Apr 27;340:c2040. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2040. BMJ. 2010. PMID: 20423965 Free PMC article.
-
A model of influences on the clinical learning environment: the case for change at one U.S. medical school.BMC Med Educ. 2017 Mar 23;17(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0900-9. BMC Med Educ. 2017. PMID: 28335770 Free PMC article.
-
How to identify, address and report students' unprofessional behaviour in medical school.Med Teach. 2020 Apr;42(4):372-379. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1692130. Epub 2019 Dec 27. Med Teach. 2020. PMID: 31880194 Review.
-
Opening the black box of school-wide student wellbeing programmes: a critical narrative review informed by activity theory.Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 May;29(2):663-687. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10261-8. Epub 2023 Jul 2. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024. PMID: 37393378 Review.
Cited by
-
Is there a way for clinical teachers to assist struggling learners? A synthetic review of the literature.Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Jan 18;8:89-97. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S123410. eCollection 2017. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017. PMID: 28176916 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Descriptors for unprofessional behaviours of medical students: a systematic review and categorisation.BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 15;17(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0997-x. BMC Med Educ. 2017. PMID: 28915870 Free PMC article.
-
Causes and characteristics of medical student referrals to a professional behaviour board.Int J Med Educ. 2017 Jan 15;8:19-24. doi: 10.5116/ijme.584b.d591. Int J Med Educ. 2017. PMID: 28088777 Free PMC article.
-
What we think about professional and unprofessional behaviors: differences between the perception of clinical faculty members and medical students.BMC Med Educ. 2022 Dec 14;22(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03874-x. BMC Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 36517813 Free PMC article.
-
Medical students' unprofessional behavior and educators' support.Korean J Med Educ. 2025 Mar;37(1):47-58. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2025.322. Epub 2025 Feb 26. Korean J Med Educ. 2025. PMID: 40049682 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Teherani A, O’Sullivan P, Lovett M, Hauer K. Categorization of unprofessional behaviours identified during administration of and remediation after a comprehensive clinical performance examination using a validated professionalism framework. Med Teach. 2009;31:1007–1012. doi: 10.3109/01421590802642537. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Parker M, Turner J, McGurgan P, Emmerton L, McAllister L, Wilkinson D. The difficult problem: assessing medical students’ professional attitudes and behaviour. Med J Austr. 2010;11/12:662–664. - PubMed
Pre-publication history
-
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/14/196/prepub
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources