Handheld ultrasound versus physical examination in patients referred for transthoracic echocardiography for a suspected cardiac condition
- PMID: 25240450
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.05.011
Handheld ultrasound versus physical examination in patients referred for transthoracic echocardiography for a suspected cardiac condition
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that handheld ultrasound (HHU) provides a more accurate diagnosis than physical examination in patients with suspected cardiovascular abnormalities and that its use thus reduces additional testing and overall costs.
Background: Despite the limitations of physical examination and the demonstrated superiority of HHU for detecting cardiac abnormalities, it is not routinely used for the bedside diagnosis of cardiac conditions.
Methods: Patients referred for a standard echocardiogram for common indications (cardiac function, murmur, stroke, arrhythmias, and miscellaneous) underwent physical examination and HHU by different cardiologists, who filled out a form that also included suggestions for additional testing, if necessary, based on their findings.
Results: Of 250 patients, 142 had an abnormal finding on standard echocardiogram. Of these, HHU correctly identified 117 patients (82%), and physical examination correctly identified 67 (47%, p < 0.0001). HHU was superior to physical examination (p < 0.0001) for both normal and abnormal cardiac function. It was also superior to physical examination in correctly identifying the presence of substantial valve disease (71% vs. 31%, p = 0.0003) and in identifying miscellaneous findings (47% vs. 3%, p < 0.0001). Of 108 patients without any abnormalities on standard echocardiography, further testing was suggested for 89 (82%) undergoing physical examination versus only 60 (56%) undergoing HHU (p < 0.0001). Cost modeling showed that HHU had an average cost of $644.43 versus an average cost of $707.44 for physical examination. This yielded a savings of $63.01 per patient when HHU was used versus physical examination.
Conclusions: When used by cardiologists, HHU provides a more accurate diagnosis than physical examination for the majority of common cardiovascular abnormalities. The finding of no significant abnormality on HHU is also likely to result in less downstream testing and thus potentially reduce the overall cost for patients being evaluated for a cardiovascular diagnosis.
Keywords: cardiac diagnosis; handheld ultrasound; physical examination.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Handheld ultrasound: accurate diagnosis at a lower cost?JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Oct;7(10):1069-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.07.008. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014. PMID: 25323173 No abstract available.
-
Reply: physical examination is still necessary and important.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 May;8(5):620-621. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.10.017. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25937199 No abstract available.
-
Physical Examination Is Still Necessary and Important.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 May;8(5):620. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.10.018. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25937200 No abstract available.
-
Handheld Ultrasound is a Valuble Bedside Tool Which Can Supplement the Bedside Cardiac Exam but not Replace It.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 May;8(5):621-622. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.12.027. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25937201 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Handheld Ultrasound is a Valuble Bedside Tool Which Can Supplement the Bedside Cardiac Exam but not Replace It.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 May;8(5):622. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.016. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25937202 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical