Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Sep 22;11(9):e1001728.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001728. eCollection 2014 Sep.

Monitoring intervention coverage in the context of universal health coverage

Affiliations
Review

Monitoring intervention coverage in the context of universal health coverage

Ties Boerma et al. PLoS Med. .

Abstract

Monitoring universal health coverage (UHC) focuses on information on health intervention coverage and financial protection. This paper addresses monitoring intervention coverage, related to the full spectrum of UHC, including health promotion and disease prevention, treatment, rehabilitation, and palliation. A comprehensive core set of indicators most relevant to the country situation should be monitored on a regular basis as part of health progress and systems performance assessment for all countries. UHC monitoring should be embedded in a broad results framework for the country health system, but focus on indicators related to the coverage of interventions that most directly reflect the results of UHC investments and strategies in each country. A set of tracer coverage indicators can be selected, divided into two groups-promotion/prevention, and treatment/care-as illustrated in this paper. Disaggregation of the indicators by the main equity stratifiers is critical to monitor progress in all population groups. Targets need to be set in accordance with baselines, historical rate of progress, and measurement considerations. Critical measurement gaps also exist, especially for treatment indicators, covering issues such as mental health, injuries, chronic conditions, surgical interventions, rehabilitation, and palliation. Consequently, further research and proxy indicators need to be used in the interim. Ideally, indicators should include a quality of intervention dimension. For some interventions, use of a single indicator is feasible, such as management of hypertension; but in many areas additional indicators are needed to capture quality of service provision. The monitoring of UHC has significant implications for health information systems. Major data gaps will need to be filled. At a minimum, countries will need to administer regular household health surveys with biological and clinical data collection. Countries will also need to improve the production of reliable, comprehensive, and timely health facility data. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Results chain framework for monitoring health sector progress and performance: focus of UHC monitoring in the red box.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Occurrence of selected procedures by country, OECD data 34 countries.
*Source: . Cardiac revascularization procedures, hip replacement, knee replacement are per 100,000 population; caesarean section per 1,000 deliveries; cataract surgery per 10,000 population. The line in the box is the median, box represents the interquartile range, the whiskers the 10th and 90th percentiles.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Coverage of selected indicators (dots) with mean of all intervention areas (pink bar) in selected countries.

References

    1. World Health Organization (2010) The world health report - health systems financing: the path to universal coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available: http://www.who.int/whr/en/index.html. Accessed 14 December 2013. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boerma T, Eozenou P, Evans D, Evans T, Kieny M-P, et al. (2014) Monitoring progress towards universal health coverage at country and global levels. PLoS Med 11: e1001731 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001731 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saksena P, Hsu J, Evans D (2014) Financial risk protection and universal health coverage: evidence and measurement challenges. PLoS Med 11: e1001701 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001701 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertrand JT, Magnani RJ, Rutenberg N (1996) Evaluating family planning programs: with adaptations for reproductive health. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill: The Evaluation Project.
    1. Boerma T, Pisani E, Schwartländer B, Mertens T (2000) A framework for the evaluation of national AIDS programmes. MEASURE Evaluation WP-99-17. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: The Evaluation Project.

Publication types

MeSH terms