Success of autologous pubovaginal sling after failed synthetic mid urethral sling
- PMID: 25245488
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.038
Success of autologous pubovaginal sling after failed synthetic mid urethral sling
Abstract
Purpose: There is no consensus on the management of persistent or recurrent stress incontinence after a failed synthetic mid urethral sling. After a mesh complication or sling failure many women and surgeons prefer to avoid a repeat mesh procedure and choose an autologous pubovaginal sling. However, little empirical work has been performed to assess the efficacy.
Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective review of 66 women who underwent autologous pubovaginal sling with rectus fascia after 1 or more failed synthetic mid urethral sling from 2007 to 2012.
Results: Mesh removal was performed before autologous pubovaginal sling in 21 patients (31.8%) while 6 (9.1%) had mesh removed simultaneously with autologous pubovaginal sling. Indications for the autologous pubovaginal sling were pure stress urinary incontinence in 16 patients (24.2%) and mixed incontinence in 50 (75.8%), 8 of whom were deemed complex with a prior urethral diverticulum or urethrovaginal fistula/urethral mesh erosion. At a mean of 14.5 months after autologous pubovaginal sling 46 (69.7%) patients reported cure of stress urinary incontinence. Of these patients 25 (37.9%) had complete cure with no stress or urgency incontinence, 17 had cure of stress urinary incontinence but had persistent urgency incontinence, and 4 had cure of stress urinary incontinence but experienced do novo urgency incontinence. Requiring a mesh excision did not predict worse outcomes compared to cases in which mesh was not removed (p=0.13). Patients with pure stress urinary incontinence were significantly more likely to be cured of all incontinence (62.5%) than those women with preoperative mixed incontinence (30.0%) (p=0.006).
Conclusions: Even after a failed synthetic mid urethral sling, autologous pubovaginal sling is effective and cured stress urinary incontinence in 69.7% of cases.
Keywords: autografts; stress; suburethral slings; surgical mesh; urinary incontinence.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Progress in stress incontinence surgery--are we destined to fail?J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):758-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.067. Epub 2014 Dec 17. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25526993 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of Autologous Fascia Pubovaginal Sling for Patients with Transvaginal Mesh Related Complications Requiring Mesh Removal.J Urol. 2016 Aug;196(2):484-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2976. Epub 2016 Mar 17. J Urol. 2016. PMID: 26997314
-
A multicenter retrospective cohort study comparing urethral diverticulectomy with and without pubovaginal sling.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):273.e1-273.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jun 3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32504566
-
Anatomical and functional results of pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.J Urol. 2001 Jul;166(1):152-7. J Urol. 2001. PMID: 11435845 Clinical Trial.
-
The autologous pubovaginal fascial sling: An update in 2019.Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2020 Jan;12(1):2-7. doi: 10.1111/luts.12281. Epub 2019 Aug 13. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2020. PMID: 31407861 Review.
-
Comparing the vaginal wall sling with autologous rectus fascia and polypropylene sling: Short term outcomes and patient satisfaction.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Dec;231:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Oct 11. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018. PMID: 30340120 Review.
Cited by
-
Autologous pubovaginal slings: back to the future or a lost art?Res Rep Urol. 2016 Jan 18;8:11-20. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S96957. eCollection 2016. Res Rep Urol. 2016. PMID: 26848479 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Autologous rectus abdominis fascia sling surgery following unsuccessful synthetic midurethral sling.IJU Case Rep. 2024 Mar 11;7(3):259-261. doi: 10.1002/iju5.12719. eCollection 2024 May. IJU Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 38686068 Free PMC article.
-
Second-Line Surgical Management After Midurethral Sling Failure.Int Neurourol J. 2021 Jun;25(2):111-118. doi: 10.5213/inj.2040278.139. Epub 2021 Mar 29. Int Neurourol J. 2021. PMID: 33781060 Free PMC article.
-
Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed midurethral sling: a survey of members of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Sep;26(9):1285-91. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2696-7. Epub 2015 Apr 18. Int Urogynecol J. 2015. PMID: 25894904
-
Revisiting current treatment options for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a contemporary literature review.Res Rep Urol. 2019 Jun 19;11:179-188. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S191555. eCollection 2019. Res Rep Urol. 2019. PMID: 31355157 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical