Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 22;16(9):e213.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.3528.

Replacing ambulatory surgical follow-up visits with mobile app home monitoring: modeling cost-effective scenarios

Kathleen A Armstrong  1 , John L Semple, Peter C Coyte
Affiliations

Replacing ambulatory surgical follow-up visits with mobile app home monitoring: modeling cost-effective scenarios

Kathleen A Armstrong et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Women's College Hospital (WCH) offers specialized surgical procedures, including ambulatory breast reconstruction in post-mastectomy breast cancer patients. Most patients receiving ambulatory surgery have low rates of postoperative events necessitating clinic visits. Increasingly, mobile monitoring and follow-up care is used to overcome the distance patients must travel to receive specialized care at a reduced cost to society. WCH has completed a feasibility study using a mobile app (QoC Health Inc, Toronto) that suggests high patient satisfaction and adequate detection of postoperative complications.

Objective: The proposed cost-effectiveness study models the replacement of conventional, in-person postoperative follow-up care with mobile app follow-up care following ambulatory breast reconstruction in post-mastectomy breast cancer patients.

Methods: This is a societal perspective cost-effectiveness analysis, wherein all costs are assessed irrespective of the payer. The patient/caregiver, health care system, and externally borne costs are calculated within the first postoperative month based on cost information provided by WCH and QoC Health Inc. The effectiveness of telemedicine and conventional follow-up care is measured as successful surgical outcomes at 30-days postoperative, and is modeled based on previous clinical trials containing similar patient populations and surgical risks.

Results: This costing assumes that 1000 patients are enrolled in bring-your-own-device (BYOD) mobile app follow-up per year and that 1.64 in-person follow-ups are attended in the conventional arm within the first month postoperatively. The total cost difference between mobile app and in-person follow-up care is $245 CAD ($223 USD based on the current exchange rate), with in-person follow-up being more expensive ($381 CAD) than mobile app follow-up care ($136 CAD). This takes into account the total of health care system, patient, and external borne costs. If we examine health care system costs alone, in-person follow-up is $38 CAD ($35 USD) more expensive than mobile app follow-up care over the first postoperative month. The baseline difference in effect is modeled to be zero based on clinical trials examining the effectiveness of telephone follow-up care in similar patient populations. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is not reportable in this scenario. An incremental net benefit (INB) is reportable, and reflects merely the cost difference between the two interventions for any willingness-to-pay value (INB=$245 CAD). The cost-effectiveness of mobile app follow-up even holds in scenarios where all mobile patients attend one in-person follow-up.

Conclusions: Mobile app follow-up care is suitably targeted to low-risk postoperative ambulatory patients. It can be cost-effective from a societal and health care system perspective.

Keywords: ambulatory monitoring; ambulatory surgical procedures; cost-effectiveness; mobile apps.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: John Semple is a shareholder in the company that produces the mobile app, QoC Health Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The mobile app user interface.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphical representation of probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrating the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) values for mobile app versus in-person follow-up care.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Government of Ontario; 2012. [2014-03-18]. 6OAShWp9R Healthy Change: Ontario's Action Plan for Health Care http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/ms/ecfa/healthy_change/
    1. Canizares M, Badley E, Davis A, Mackay C, Mahomed N. Orthopaedic surgery in Ontario in the era of the wait time strategy. Toronto: Arthritis Community Research & Evaluation Unit, University Health Network; 2007. [2014-08-14]. 6RpPCZN5l http://www.acreu.ca/pdf/pub5/07-02.pdf.
    1. Jones DT, Yoon MJ, Licameli G. Effectiveness of postoperative follow-up telephone interviews for patients who underwent adenotonsillectomy: a retrospective study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Nov;133(11):1091–5. doi: 10.1001/archotol.133.11.1091. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davidge KM, Brown M, Morgan P, Semple JL. Processes of care in autogenous breast reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flaps: expediting postoperative discharge in an ambulatory setting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Sep;132(3):339e–44e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829ace62. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Platt J, Baxter N, Zhong T. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. CMAJ. 2011 Dec 13;183(18):2109–2116. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110513. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types