Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014 Nov 25;111(11):2067-75.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.494. Epub 2014 Sep 23.

Dose escalation to rash for erlotinib plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer: the phase II RACHEL study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Dose escalation to rash for erlotinib plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer: the phase II RACHEL study

E Van Cutsem et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: This phase II, open-label, randomised study evaluated whether patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving erlotinib/gemcitabine derived survival benefits from increasing the erlotinib dose.

Methods: After a 4-week run-in period (gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) once weekly plus erlotinib 100 mg per day), patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who developed grade 0/1 rash were randomised to receive gemcitabine plus erlotinib dose escalation (150 mg, increasing by 50 mg every 2 weeks (maximum 250 mg); n=71) or gemcitabine plus standard-dose erlotinib (100 mg per day; n=75). The primary end point was to determine whether overall survival (OS) was improved by increasing the erlotinib dose. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), incidence of grade ⩾2 rash, and safety.

Results: Erlotinib dose escalation induced grade ⩾2 rash in 29 out of 71 (41.4%) patients compared with 7 out of 75 (9.3%) patients on standard dose. Efficacy was not significantly different in the dose-escalation arm compared with the standard-dose arm (OS: median 7.0 vs 8.4 months, respectively, hazard ratio (HR), 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-1.80; P=0.2026; PFS: median 3.5 vs 4.5 months, respectively, HR, 1.09, 95% CI: 0.77-1.54; P=0.6298). Incidence of adverse events was comparable between randomised arms.

Conclusion: The erlotinib dose-escalation strategy induced rash in some patients; there was no evidence that the higher dose translated into increased benefit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design of the phase II RACHEL (BO21128) study. The 4-week run-in period was based on a median onset for rash development in patients treated with erlotinib plus gemcitabine for 10 days (with 90% of patients experiencing rash within 44 days) seen in the PA.3 study (Wacker et al, 2007). Erlotinib dose escalation—starting at 150 mg per day increasing at 50 mg every 2 weeks until a maximum of 250 mg per day or grade ⩾2 rash developed (patients were held at the lowest dose that induced grade ⩾2 rash). A 50-mg increment allowed monitoring of rash development/other toxicities and ensured patients were not exposed to unnecessarily high doses of erlotinib. Abbreviations: ECOG PS=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; OS=overall survival; PD=disease progression; PFS=progression-free survival.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT diagram of patient disposition through the study. Standard dose: patients with grade 0 or 1 rash after the run-in period and eligible for randomisation (no PD and no dose adjustments to <75% of the full dose of chemotherapy). Dose escalation: patients with grade 0 or 1 rash after the run-in period and eligible for randomisation (no PD and no dose adjustments to <75% of the full dose of chemotherapy). Non-randomised, non-eligible: patients with grade 0 or 1 rash after the run-in period, but non-eligible for randomisation (having PD or dose adjustments to <75% of the full dose of chemotherapy). Non-randomised, grade ⩾2 rash: patients with grade ⩾2 rash after the run-in period. Early dropouts: patients with ECOG PS 2, PD, or serious adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation or death before randomisation. Abbreviations: ECOG PS=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; ITT=intent-to-treat; PD=disease progression. aOne patient excluded due to dose escalation before randomisation. bTwo patients randomised to the dose-escalation arm, but who did not receive dose escalation were added. cTwo patients randomised to the dose-escalation arm, but who did not receive dose escalation were removed and two patients with dose escalation from the non-randomised arm were added.
Figure 3
Figure 3
OS (from randomisation) for patients who were randomised to the standard therapy arm (gemcitabine plus erlotinib 100 mg per day) or the dose-escalation arm (gemcitabine plus escalating doses of erlotinib). Abbreviations: HR=hazard ratio; OS=overall survival.
Figure 4
Figure 4
OS (from the start of the run-in period) for patients who did not develop grade ⩾2 rash during the 4-week run-in period who were randomised to receive standard therapy (gemcitabine plus erlotinib 100 mg per day) or dose escalation (gemcitabine plus escalating doses of erlotinib), compared with non-randomised patients who developed grade ⩾2 rash during the run-in period. Abbreviation: OS=overall survival.

References

    1. Alejandro LM, Adel NG, O'Reilly EM, Riedel E, Lacouture ME. Association between skin toxicities and treatment outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) receiving erlotinib (E): Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) experience. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:Abstract 294.
    1. Amador MR, Oppenheimer D, Perea S, Maitra A, Cusatis G, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, Baker SD, Ashfaq R, Takimoto C, Forastiere A, Hidalgo M. An epidermal growth factor receptor intro 1 polymorphism mediates response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2004;64:9139–9143. - PubMed
    1. Aranda E, Manzano JL, Rivera F, Galán M, Valladares-Ayerbes M, Pericay C, Safont MJ, Mendez MJ, Irigoyen A, Arrivi A, Sastre J, Díaz-Rubio E. Phase II open-label study of erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine in unresectable and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: relationship between skin rash and survival (Pantar study) Ann Oncol. 2012;23:1919–1925. - PubMed
    1. Buges C, Marti AM, Rosell R, Vergnenegre A, De Marinis F, Massuti B, De Castro J, Gervais R, Costa EC, Moran T, Santarpia M, Felip E, Majem M, Porta R, Palmero R, Drozdowskyj A, Heidecke C, Gasco A, Taron M, Paz-Ares LG. Skin toxicity associated with outcome to erlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (p) with EGFR mutations in the EURTAC study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:Abstract 7542.
    1. Burris H, 3rd, Rocha-Lima C. New therapeutic directions for advanced pancreatic cancer: targeting the epidermal growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways. Oncologist. 2008;13:289–298. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms