Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Sep 23:349:g5740.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5740.

Effect of providing free glasses on children's educational outcomes in China: cluster randomized controlled trial

Xiaochen Ma  1 , Zhongqiang Zhou  2 , Hongmei Yi  3 , Xiaopeng Pang  4 , Yaojiang Shi  5 , Qianyun Chen  6 , Mirjam E Meltzer  6 , Saskia le Cessie  7 , Mingguang He  6 , Scott Rozelle  8 , Yizhi Liu  6 , Nathan Congdon  9
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of providing free glasses on children's educational outcomes in China: cluster randomized controlled trial

Xiaochen Ma et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of provision of free glasses on academic performance in rural Chinese children with myopia.

Design: Cluster randomized, investigator masked, controlled trial.

Setting: 252 primary schools in two prefectures in western China, 2012-13.

Participants: 3177 of 19,934 children in fourth and fifth grades (mean age 10.5 years) with visual acuity <6/12 in either eye without glasses correctable to >6/12 with glasses. 3052 (96.0%) completed the study.

Interventions: Children were randomized by school (84 schools per arm) to one of three interventions at the beginning of the school year: prescription for glasses only (control group), vouchers for free glasses at a local facility, or free glasses provided in class.

Main outcome measures: Spectacle wear at endline examination and end of year score on a specially designed mathematics test, adjusted for baseline score and expressed in standard deviations.

Results: Among 3177 eligible children, 1036 (32.6%) were randomized to control, 988 (31.1%) to vouchers, and 1153 (36.3%) to free glasses in class. All eligible children would benefit from glasses, but only 15% wore them at baseline. At closeout glasses wear was 41% (observed) and 68% (self reported) in the free glasses group, and 26% (observed) and 37% (self reported) in the controls. Effect on test score was 0.11 SD (95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.21) when the free glasses group was compared with the control group. The adjusted effect of providing free glasses (0.10, 0.002 to 0.19) was greater than parental education (0.03, -0.04 to 0.09) or family wealth (0.01, -0.06 to 0.08). This difference between groups was significant, but was smaller than the prespecified 0.20 SD difference that the study was powered to detect.

Conclusions: The provision of free glasses to Chinese children with myopia improves children's performance on mathematics testing to a statistically significant degree, despite imperfect compliance, although the observed difference between groups was smaller than the study was originally designed to detect. Myopia is common and rarely corrected in this setting.Trial Registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN03252665.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: the free glasses used in this study were supplied by OneSight, Luxottica-China, and Essilor-China, producers of frames and lenses in China who also provided financial support for the study; the authors have no other financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

None
Enrolment and progress of children through study
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Dimension of Disability in India, chapter 4, table 4.3 (b). 2013. http://mospi.nic.in/Mospi_New/upload/disablity_india_statistical_data_11....
    1. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Organ 2008;86:63-70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krumholtz I. Results from a pediatric vision screening and its ability to predict academic performance. Optometry 2000;71:426-30. - PubMed
    1. Atkinson J, Anker S, Nardini M, Braddick O, Hughes C, Rae S, Wattam-Bell J, Atkinson S. Infant vision screening predicts failure on motor and cognitive tests up to school age. Strabismus 2002;10:187-98. - PubMed
    1. Williams WR, Latif AH, Hannington L, Watkins DR. Hyperopia and educational attainment in a primary school cohort. Arch Dis Childhood 2005;90:150-3. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data