Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Sep 4:8:276.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00276. eCollection 2014.

Socioeconomic status and structural brain development

Natalie H Brito  1 , Kimberly G Noble  1
Affiliations
Review

Socioeconomic status and structural brain development

Natalie H Brito et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Recent advances in neuroimaging methods have made accessible new ways of disentangling the complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors that influence structural brain development. In recent years, research investigating associations between socioeconomic status (SES) and brain development have found significant links between SES and changes in brain structure, especially in areas related to memory, executive control, and emotion. This review focuses on studies examining links between structural brain development and SES disparities of the magnitude typically found in developing countries. We highlight how highly correlated measures of SES are differentially related to structural changes within the brain.

Keywords: brain development; environmental variation; socioeconomic status; structural imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hypothesized mechanisms by which SES operates to influence structural and functional brain development.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Adler N. E., Boyce T., Chesney M. A., Cohen S., Folkman S., Kahn R. L., et al. (1994). Socioeconomic status and health: the challenge of the gradient. Am. Psychol. 49:15 10.1037/0003-066X.49.1.15 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adler N. E., Epel E. S., Castellazzo G., Ickovics J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol. 19, 586–592 10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson N. B., Armstead C. A. (1995). Toward understanding the association of socioeconomic status and health: a new challenge for the biopsychosocial approach. Psychosom. Med. 57, 213–225 10.1097/00006842-199505000-00003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bradley R. H., Corwyn R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53, 371–399 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bradley R. H., Corwyn R. F., Burchinal M., McAdoo H. P., García Coll C. (2001). The home environments of children in the United States Part II: relations with behavioral development through age thirteen. Child Dev. 72, 1868–1886 10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00383 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources