Measuring the effectiveness of mentoring as a knowledge translation intervention for implementing empirical evidence: a systematic review
- PMID: 25252002
- PMCID: PMC4285206
- DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12060
Measuring the effectiveness of mentoring as a knowledge translation intervention for implementing empirical evidence: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Mentoring as a knowledge translation (KT) intervention uses social influence among healthcare professionals to increase use of evidence in clinical practice.
Aim: To determine the effectiveness of mentoring as a KT intervention designed to increase healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases (i.e., MEDLINE, CINAHL), grey literature, and hand searching. Eligible studies evaluated mentoring of healthcare professionals responsible for patient care to enhance the uptake of evidence into practice. Mentoring is defined as (a) a mentor more experienced than mentee; (b) individualized support based on mentee's needs; and (c) involved in an interpersonal relationship as indicated by mutual benefit, engagement, and commitment. Two reviewers independently screened citations for eligibility, extracted data, and appraised quality of studies. Data were analyzed descriptively.
Results: Of 10,669 citations from 1988 to 2012, 10 studies were eligible. Mentoring as a KT intervention was evaluated in Canada, USA, and Australia. Exposure to mentoring compared to no mentoring improved some behavioral outcomes (one study). Compared to controls or other multifaceted interventions, multifaceted interventions with mentoring improved practitioners' knowledge (four of five studies), beliefs (four of six studies), and impact on organizational outcomes (three of four studies). There were mixed findings for changes in professionals' behaviors and impact on practitioners' and patients' outcomes: some outcomes improved, while others showed no difference.
Linking evidence to action: Only one study evaluated the effectiveness of mentoring alone as a KT intervention and showed improvement in some behavioral outcomes. The other nine studies that evaluated the effectiveness of mentoring as part of a multifaceted intervention showed mixed findings, making it difficult to determine the added effect of mentoring. Further research is needed to identify effective mentoring as a KT intervention.
Keywords: advanced practice/advanced nursing practice; evidence-based practice; mentorship; meta-analysis; outcome evaluation; professional issues/professional ethics/professional standards.
© 2014 The Authors Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Sigma Theta Tau International The Honor Society of Nursing.
Figures
References
-
- Augestad KM, Bellika JG, Budrionis A, Chomutare T, Lindsetmo RO, Patel H, Delaney C. Surgical telementoring in knowledge translation—clinical outcomes and educational benefits: A comprehensive review. Surgical Innovation. 2013;20(3):273–281. - PubMed
-
- Berner ES, Baker CS, Funkhouser E, Heudebert GR, Allison JJ, Fargason CA, Jr, Kiefe CI. Do local opinion leaders augment hospital quality improvement efforts? A randomized trial to promote adherence to unstable angina guidelines. Medical Care. 2003;41(3):420–431. - PubMed
-
- Birch DW, Asiri AH, de Gara CJ. The impact of a formal mentoring program for minimally invasive surgery on surgeon practice and patient outcomes. The American Journal of Surgery. 2007;193(5):589–591. - PubMed
-
- Campbell J. The effect of nurse champions on compliance with Keystone Intensive Care Unit Sepsis-screening Protocol. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly. 2008;31(3):251–269. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
