Pneumonia prevention to decrease mortality in intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 25252684
- DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu740
Pneumonia prevention to decrease mortality in intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Erratum in
-
Roquilly a et al (Clin Infect Dis 2015; 60:64-75).Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 1;60(9):1449. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ112. Epub 2015 Feb 23. Clin Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 25713181 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: To determine the strategies of prevention of hospital-acquired pneumonia that reduce mortality in intensive care unit (ICU).
Methods: We followed PRISMA (Preferred Reported Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (through 10 June 2014) as well as reference lists of articles. We included all randomized controlled trials conducted in critically ill adult patients hospitalized in ICUs and evaluating digestive prophylactic methods (selective digestive decontamination [SDD], acidification of gastric content, early enteral feeding, prevention of microinhalation); circuit prophylactic methods (closed suctioning systems, early tracheotomy, aerosolized antibiotics, humidification, lung secretion drainage, silver-coated endotracheal tubes) or oropharyngeal prophylactic methods (selective oropharyngeal decontamination, patient position, sinusitis prophylaxis, subglottic secretion drainage, tracheal cuff monitoring). One reviewer extracted data that were checked by 3 others. The primary outcome was the mortality rate in the ICU.
Results: We identified 157 randomized trials to pool in a meta-analysis. The primary outcome was available in 145 studies (n = 37 156). The risk ratio (RR) for death was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], .92-.99; P = .02) in the intervention groups. In subgroup analysis, only SDD significantly decreased mortality compared with control (n = 10 227; RR, 0.84 [95% CI, .76-.92; P < .001]). The RR for in-ICU death was 0.78 (95% CI, .69-.89; P < .001; I(2) = 33%) in trials investigating SDD with systemic antimicrobial therapy and 1.00 (.84-1.21; P = .96; I(2) = 0%) without systemic antimicrobial therapy.
Conclusions: Selective digestive decontamination with systemic antimicrobial therapy reduced mortality and should be considered in critically ill patients at high risk for death.
Keywords: hospital-acquired pneumonia/prevention; mechanical ventilation; mortality; selective digestive decontamination.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Comment in
-
Editorial commentary: Evidence vs instinct for pneumonia prevention in hospitalized patients.Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jan 1;60(1):76-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu744. Epub 2014 Sep 24. Clin Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 25252683 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reply to Hurley.Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jun 1;60(11):1730-1. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ126. Epub 2015 Feb 20. Clin Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 25701852 No abstract available.
-
Is selective decontamination of the digestive tract safe?Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jun 1;60(11):1729-30. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ125. Epub 2015 Feb 20. Clin Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 25701853 No abstract available.
-
Pneumonia Prevention to Decrease Mortality in Intensive Care Units.Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Sep 1;61(5):855. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ410. Epub 2015 May 28. Clin Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 26021994 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Kuriyama and Urushidani.Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Sep 1;61(5):855-6. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ412. Epub 2015 May 28. Clin Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 26021995 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
